Yorkshire Post

Ministers rip up rail deal and take back Northern

Train operator pays price for losing passenger trust

- DAVID BEHRENS COUNTY CORRESPOND­ENT ■ Email: david.behrens@jpimedia.co.uk ■ Twitter: @yorkshirep­ost

YORKSHIRE’S BIGGEST train operator had its contract torn up by the Government yesterday, five years early and less than four years into its tenure.

The decision to sack Northern and renational­ise its franchise came just 24 hours after an industry poll revealed that satisfacti­on with services in the region was the lowest in the country.

The Transport Secretary, Grant Shapps, said passengers had “lost trust in the North’s rail network” and that the service had “failed to meet the needs of passengers”. He added: “People across the North deserve better.”

He chose to return the Northern franchise to public ownership, rather than impose a shortterm deal on its German-owned operator, Arriva, having revealed earlier this month that the contract was no longer financiall­y sustainabl­e and would be able to continue in its present form for only a few more months.

From March 1 commuter trains across the county will be operated by a company wholly owned by the Department of Transport and run by what he called “experience­d railway managers”.

The so-called Operator of Last Resort already runs the East Coast main line between Yorkshire and London, having taken over from the collapsed Virgin East Coast consortium.

Mr Shapps said it was “completely unacceptab­le that “millions of rail passengers” had been made “to start and end their working day facing cancellati­ons and delays”, adding that some stations had been “left without trains for hours on end”.

But he warned that while the move was “a new beginning for Northern”, its network – on which fewer than one train in three ran on time in some parts of Yorkshire last month – was “not going to be quick or easy to put right”.

He added: “Nonetheles­s, I am determined that Northern passengers see real and tangible improvemen­ts across the network as soon as possible.”

Mr Shapps said travellers should notice no difference other than a gradual improvemen­t in services, while the Rail Minister, Chris Heaton-Harris, confirmed to The Yorkshire Post that the Northern branding would continue to appear on trains and that it would remain “business as usual” for its staff, including managers.

He also said it had not been “the hardest of decisions” to tear up the contract. “You had massive passenger dissatisfa­ction, coupled with the company breaking part of its franchise agreement,” he said.

Mr Shapps said he had ordered the new operator to deliver a plan within 100 days “to make sure we leave no stone unturned in improving this franchise”.

Arriva, which also operates rail franchises in the South-East, blamed “external factors” for many problems but accepted that “a new plan” was needed for the North. Chris Burchell, managing director of its trains division, said: “We recognise that overall service improvemen­ts have not come quickly enough. For that, we wholeheart­edly apologise.”

From: Adrian Caltieri, Thirsk Road, Northaller­ton.

THERE is no pot of money to be re-allocated if HS2 were to be cancelled as the money for its constructi­on is yet to be borrowed and then repaid using fare revenue from the new line (The Yorkshire Post, January 25). If there are viable local rail schemes in the North, then they can seek funding irrespecti­ve of HS2.

The problem for local rail services in the North is successive government­s choosing not to support improvemen­ts. The congested rail corridor at Manchester Oxford Road which affects Northern and TransPenni­ne services, the cancelling of electrific­ation from London to Sheffield, and the continued use of non-accessibil­ity compliant trains are just a few examples.

What will definitely waste money is if HS2 is cancelled. The £9bn already spent will effectivel­y have been burned as there will no fare revenue from a line that has not been completed. HS2 will bring massive economic benefit to the Leeds City Region and as a result Wakefield will benefit. Nationally HS2 will support 30,000 skilled jobs. The most likely outcome if it is cancelled is that the high skilled workforce will move on to the next project, which would probably be Crossrail 2 in London.

From: Anthony French, Buckingham Road, Conisbroug­h.

WHILST union leader Manuel Cortes deserves much credit for his long time support for, and promotion of, the modernisat­ion of Britain’s railways, his tubthumpin­g endorsemen­t of HS2 is misplaced.

His views will find no favour with those concerned that, apart from wholesale demolition of people’s’ first homes in parts of South Yorkshire, along its planned route it impacts directly on five wildlife refuges of national importance, 33 sites of special scientific interest, 693 designated wildlife sites, 21 designated local nature reserves, 26 landscape scale initiative­s, 18 wildlife trusts reserves and 108 ancient woodlands.

All of which, of course, support jobs and have beneficial effects on the comfort and well-being of hundreds of thousands of people across England.

He should be throwing his weight behind calls to improve, as a matter of urgency, the lamentable state of Yorkshire’s own railways. Young people might then want to bring their skills to Yorkshire, and make their home in a place where trains will actually get them from one place to another when they say they will and they’ll be able to sit down.

Sorry, Mr Cortes; given that your position demands your promoting jobs, your promotion of the benefits of HS2 comes across as strident, sloganisin­g businessma­n’s blether.

From: P A Lord, Holmfirth.

I WAS interested to read Tom Richmond’s comments (The Yorkshire Post, January 18) about the Northern funding offer for community projects.

Their tiny advert led to an online link which enthused about the funding available for almost any ‘worthwhile’ community project but only allowed a week to complete and submit the applicatio­n form! The deadline was January 22.

A friend and I managed to complete the applicatio­n form, which you had to complete in one go, and get it in by the deadline, but it was a rush. The cynic in me did wonder if this could have been a token gesture by Northern in order to look good and improve their godawful image. Surely not...

 ?? PICTURE: AP PHOTO ?? DIFFICULT TO GAUGE: Should Public Health England be more open about the risks from the coronaviru­s outbreak?
PICTURE: AP PHOTO DIFFICULT TO GAUGE: Should Public Health England be more open about the risks from the coronaviru­s outbreak?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom