Yorkshire Post

New rules on immigratio­n ‘could spell disaster for care industry’

- Mike Padgham Mike Padgham is chair of the Independen­t Care Group based in Scarboroug­h and a national campaigner on social care.

GOVERNMENT PLANS to change immigratio­n rules have been criticised by a national campaigner who says it could spell disaster for the care industry.

The Government has already come under fire for telling employers they will “need to adjust” after deciding it will not offer visas to low-skilled migrant workers after Brexit.

A policy statement outlining plans for a new points-based system after freedom of movement ends said the economy needs to move away from a reliance on “cheap labour from Europe”.

Now Mike Padgham, chair of the Independen­t Care Group based in Scarboroug­h and a national campaigner on social care, is calling for a Government rethink.

Applicants will need to meet a minimum salary of £25,600. The changes are designed to cut the number of low-skilled migrants

entering Britain from next year but aim to make it easier for higher-skilled workers to get UK visas.

The Confederat­ion of British Industry has already warned care, constructi­on, hospitalit­y, food and drink companies could be affected.

Industry leaders hit out at the lack of provision for low-paid workers in the proposals while lawyers urged the Government “not to turn the tap off overnight” if companies struggle to recruit staff under the new system.

Writing in The Yorkshire Post today, Mr Padgham said proposal on visas, which would cut off a “vital source of recruitmen­t for care workers”, could hit the industry hard.

“So today I call on the Government to have a re-think or make social care a special case so that we are not left short of thousands of care workers we urgently need,” he writes. “And through this newspaper I repeat my longstandi­ng invitation to the Prime Minister or a senior Minister to visit us here in North Yorkshire, see social care on the frontline and ask whether they still think they have got it right.”

OF ALL the blows dealt to social care over the last few decades – and there have been plenty – the Government’s latest proposal on visas, which would cut off a vital source of recruitmen­t for care workers, could be the most devastatin­g.

So today I call on the Government to have a re-think or make social care a special case so that we are not left short of thousands of care workers we urgently need. I repeat my long-standing invitation to the Prime Minister or a senior minister to visit us here in North Yorkshire, see social care on the frontline and ask whether they still think they have got it right. Furthermor­e, the Government has to address the ongoing crisis in social care, starting with measures in next month’s Budget.

The Government is saying that socalled unskilled workers won’t be able to come to this country under its proposed immigratio­n points system. Its argument is that it wants employers to concentrat­e on recruiting British workers. In my own care business, some 10 per cent of staff are from other EU countries and we couldn’t function without them. The simple fact is, social care has to be better paid and held in higher esteem for the benefit of all workers, whether they are British or from overseas. Let there be no doubt that social care is a highly-skilled job but it is poorly-paid. It is a hugely rewarding job but it can be challengin­g, stressful and demanding. With the right pay and the recognitio­n it deserves, social care could become more a career of choice. But at the moment for far too many it isn’t and there are other jobs which pay as well or better for less stress.

There are plenty of vacancies to fill. The sector is already short – there are 120,000 care vacancies on any one day. And with a rapidly ageing population we are going to need many thousands more, not fewer, care workers – some say up to 700,000 more by 2035.

Estimates say ending freedom of movement could rob the sector of up to 115,000 care workers between now and 2026. The sector will be the victim of a vicious circle. Social care is chronicall­y under-funded and has been for a generation. Some £8bn has been cut from local authority social care budgets since 2010. Despite numerous calls for funding reform and the Prime Minister promising to tackle social care, nothing is happening.

That means providers cannot afford to pay their staff the kind of wage that truly reflects the excellent care they offer. There simply isn’t enough money to do so. Because of that, social care workers aren’t paid well enough to be classed as skilled workers under the Government’s proposed visa points system – even though anyone with even the most rudimentar­y grasp of what carers do can plainly see that it is a very highly-skilled job.

Unless the proposals change or social care is somehow made exempt, the sector is going to be robbed of a vital source of staff. This would be a devastatin­g blow and on top of the ongoing funding crisis and other increasing pressures – not least the higher than expected increase in the National Living Wage – it might be the final straw for some providers who are already struggling to break even. It would heap further pressure on an already crumbling social care sector which will in turn pile more pressure on NHS healthcare, which will have to pick up the pieces when less and less social care is available. Furthermor­e, if social care fails, families will have to do the caring instead, even more than many already do. The steady stream of people giving up work to take care of loved ones will become a torrent.

If that number grows massively, as it surely would, the impact on the economy would be significan­t. The Government knows all of this. Indeed, numerous government­s have known this going back a generation, but none has ever done anything about it.

Critics will say that providers should cut their own profits and pay their staff better. Whilst there will always be exceptions, most providers do try to pay their staff as well as they can.

At the same time, providers have to make a profit, both to comply with Care Quality Commission stipulatio­ns and to invest in their businesses. We wouldn’t be facing the current crisis if social care was properly funded and that is why measures have to come in new Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s first Budget. The recently-promised £1.5bn extra for social care won’t even touch the sides of the current shortfall and will be swallowed up by the increase in the National Living Wage.

Instead we need to see social care properly funded, if needs be by an increase in taxation or National Insurance. I honestly believe people would be willing to pay a little more if they knew there was going to be a proper care system in place to look after them in their later years. If the Government wants good, sustainabl­e social care, it is going to have to pay for it and sort out this mess once and for all.

Unless the proposals change or social care is somehow made exempt, the sector is going to be robbed of a vital source of staff. This would be a devastatin­g blow.

 ??  ?? MIKE PADGHAM: Called on the Government to rethink its policy on care workers.
MIKE PADGHAM: Called on the Government to rethink its policy on care workers.
 ?? PICTURES: ADOBESTOCK ?? STAFF CRISIS: The Government’s visa proposals threaten to cut off the supply of care workers at a time when demand is soaring.
PICTURES: ADOBESTOCK STAFF CRISIS: The Government’s visa proposals threaten to cut off the supply of care workers at a time when demand is soaring.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom