Albany Times Union (Sunday)

Court stage set for ideologica­l combat

-

The following editorial is from the New York Daily News:

Justice Anthony Kennedy was never the liberal stalwart progressiv­es prayed for or the down-the-line conservati­ve those who put him on the Supreme Court sought.

But in his 30 years on the court his votes and rulings, from gay rights to Citizens United — and despite helping install George W. Bush in the White House in Bush vs. Gore — Kennedy served as a steady reminder that the court existed for the essential purpose of guiding the nation based on law and precedent applied independen­t of political party or klatch.

The notion of an impartial Supreme Court feels as elusive as ever with Kennedy’s July 31 retirement. The great divider, President Trump will too gladly advance the Court’s transforma­tion into a body that stands split along partisan lines on questions of law and liberty.

Trump wields the necessary (if slim) Senate majority, and a list of nominees vetted by conservati­ve groups.

Confirmed unanimousl­y after Democrats blocked lightning rod Robert Bork, Kennedy mostly affirmed conservati­ve doctrine and GOP prerogativ­es. In the session just ended, he upheld Trump’s travel ban, voted against unions, supported the pro-life position on pregnancy centers and law enforcemen­t in a search and privacy case.

But he also frustrated conservati­ves by taking the center on abortion, upholding Roe v. Wade while supporting some restrictio­ns. Meanwhile, he became a surprising­ly progressiv­e justice on LGBT issues. On all four of the court’s gay rights rulings — from overturnin­g sodomy laws to gay marriage — Kennedy wrote every one.

Now bare-knuckled ideologica­l purity — on corporate and church power, reproducti­ve rights, property, privacy and more — will prevail.

Senate Republican­s have smashed norm after norm to keep a grip on judicial appointmen­ts — culminatin­g in leaving a seat vacant for more than a year following Antonin Scalia’s death, not even giving President Obama’s nominee Merrick Garland a hearing and thus permitting Trump to appoint Neil Gorsuch.

Democrats understand­ably itch to tit for tat, and should at least wait and see who Trump has in store. Better to scrap like hell to take both chambers of Congress this November than fight a war unarmed.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States