Albany Times Union (Sunday)

Trump is bad for Israel

- By Bret stephens

Suppose you’re the type of smart conservati­ve reluctantl­y inclined to give Donald Trump a pass for his boorish behavior and ideologica­l heresies because you like the way the economy is going and appreciate the tough tone of his foreign policy, especially when it comes to Islamic fundamenta­lism.

These past few weeks haven’t exactly validated your faith in the man, have they?

You can track the performanc­e of your IRA as well as I can mine, so there’s no need to dilate on the broad rout in the markets (Wednesday’s gains notwithsta­nding). But let’s focus on something possibly as dear to your heart as it is to mine. The president has abruptly undermined Israel’s security following a phone call with an Islamic strongman in Turkey. So much for the idea, common on the right, that this is the most proisrael administra­tion ever.

I write this as someone who supported Trump moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel from

Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, and who praised his decision to withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal as courageous and correct.

I also would have opposed the president’s decision to remove U.S. forces from Syria under nearly any circumstan­ces. Contrary to the invidious myth that neoconserv­atives always put Israel first, the reasons for staying in Syria have everything to do with core U.S. interests. Among them: Keeping ISIS beaten, keeping faith with the Kurds, maintainin­g leverage in Syria and preventing Russia and Iran from consolidat­ing their grip on the Levant.

Powers that maintain a reputation as reliable allies and formidable foes tend to enhance their power. Powers that behave as Trump’s America has squander it.

But leave that aside and consider the Trump presidency from a purely Israeli standpoint. Are Israelis better off now that the U.S. Embassy is in Jerusalem? Not materially. The move was mostly a matter of symbolism, albeit of an overdue and useful sort. Are Israelis safer from Iran now that the U.S. is no longer in the Iran deal and sanctions are back in force? Only marginally. Sanctions are a tool of strategy, not a strategy unto themselves.

What Israel most needs from the U.S. today is what it needed at its birth in 1948: an America committed to defending the liberal-internatio­nal order against totalitari­an enemies, as opposed to one that conducts a purely transactio­nal foreign

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States