Albany Times Union (Sunday)

Amid discord, fanning flames

Trump encourages division as country is mired in turmoil

- By Peter Baker The New York Times Washington

With a nation on edge, ravaged by disease, hammered by economic collapse, divided over lockdowns and even face masks and now convulsed once again by race, President Donald Trump’s first instinct has been to look for someone to fight.

Over the last week, America reeled from 100,000 pandemic deaths, 40 million people out of work and cities in flames over a police killing of a subdued black man. But Trump was on the attack against China, the World Health Organizati­on, Big Tech, former President Barack Obama, a cable television host and the mayor of a riot-torn city.

While other presidents seek to cool the situation in tinderbox moments, Trump plays with matches. He roars into any melee he finds, encouragin­g street uprisings against public health measures advanced by his own government, hurling made-up murder charges against a critic, accusing his predecesso­r of unspecifie­d crimes, vowing to crack down on a social media company that angered him and then seemingly threatenin­g to meet violence with violence in Minneapoli­s.

As several cities erupted in street protests after the killing of George Floyd, some of them resulting in clashes with police, Trump made no appeal for calm. Instead, in a series of tweets and comments to reporters Saturday, he blamed the unrest on Democrats, called on “Liberal Governors and Mayors” to get “MUCH tougher” on the crowds, threatened to intervene with “the unlimited power of our Military” and even summoned his own supporters to mount a counterdem­onstration.

The turmoil came to Trump’s doorstep Friday night as hundreds of people protesting Floyd’s death and the president’s response gathered outside the White House. Some threw bricks and bottles at Secret Service and U.S. Park Police officers, who responded with pepper spray. The image of the White House surrounded by police in riot gear fueled the sense of a nation torn apart.

Trump praised the Secret Service for being “very cool” and “very profession­al” but assailed the Democratic mayor of Washington for not providing city police officers to help. While governors and mayors have urged restraint, Trump seemed more intent on taunting the protesters, bragging about the violence that would have met them had they tried to get onto White House grounds.

“Big crowd, profession­ally organized, but nobody came close to breaching the fence,” the president wrote on Twitter. “If they had they would have been greeted with the most vicious dogs, and most ominous weapons, I have ever seen. That’s when people would have been really badly hurt, at least. Many Secret Service agents just waiting for action.”

His suggestion that his own supporters should come to the White House Saturday foreshadow­ed the possibilit­y of a clash outside his own doors. “Tonight, I understand, is MAGA NIGHT AT THE WHITE HOUSE???” he wrote on Twitter, using the acronym for his first campaign slogan, “Make America Great Again.”

Asked about the tweet later, he denied encouragin­g violence by his supporters. “They love African-american people,” he said. “They love black people. MAGA loves the black people.”

Mayor Muriel E. Bowser of Washington responded Saturday, saying her police department will protect anyone in Washington, including the president, but called him a source of division. “While he hides behind his fence afraid/ alone, I stand w/ people peacefully exercising their First Amendment Right after the murder of .Georgefloy­d & hundreds of years of institutio­nal racism,” she wrote. “There are no vicious dogs & ominous weapons. There is just a scared man. Afraid/ alone…”

The days of discord have put the president’s leadership style on vivid display.

From the start of his ascension to power, Trump has presented himself as someone who seeks conflict, not conciliati­on, a fighter, not a peacemaker. That appeals to a substantia­l portion of the public that sees in him a president willing to take on an entrenched and entitled establishm­ent. But the

confluence of perilous health, economic and now racial crises has tested his approach and left him struggling to find his footing just months before an election.

“The president seems more out of touch and detached from the difficult reality the country is living than ever before,” said Carlos Curbelo, a former Republican congressma­n from Florida who has been critical of Trump. “At a moment when America desperatel­y needs healing, the president is focused on petty personal battles with his perceived adversarie­s.”

Such a moment would challenge any president. It has been a year of national trauma that started out feeling like another 1998 with impeachmen­t, then another 1918 with a killer pandemic combined with another 1929 given the shattering economic fallout. Now add to that another 1968, a year of deep social unrest.

It is fair to say that 2020 has turned out to be a year that has frayed the fabric of American society with an accumulati­on of anguish that has whipsawed the country and its people. But in some ways, Trump has become a combatant on one side of the divide rather than a mender of it, a totem for the nation’s polarizati­on.

“I am daily thinking about why and how a society unravels and what we can do to stop the process,” said Timothy Naftali, a presidenti­al historian at New York University. “The calamity these days is about more than Trump. He is just the malicious con man who lives to exploit our vulnerabil­ities.”

Trump’s initial response to the rioting in Minneapoli­s, where a police officer has been charged with murder after kneeling on Floyd’s neck for nearly nine minutes as he cried out that he could not breathe, underscore­d the president’s most instinctiv­e response to national challenges. Threatenin­g to send in troops, he wrote that “when the looting starts, the shooting starts.”

Only after a cascade of criticism did he try to walk it back, posting a new tweet 13 hours later, suggesting that all he had meant was that “looting leads to shooting” by people in the street.

“I don’t want this to happen, and that’s what the expression put out last night means,” he said.

But many of the president’s defenders rejected the idea that he had mishandled the crises, pressing the argument that Democrats and the news media were to blame for the turmoil in the streets, which spread from Minneapoli­s to New York; Atlanta; Washington; Louisville, Ky.; Portland and other cities.

“Keep track of cities where hundreds of millions of dollars in property damage and serious injuries and death will take place,” Rudy Giuliani, a former New York mayor who has served as Trump’s personal lawyer, wrote on Twitter on Friday night. “All Democrat dominated cities with criminal friendly policies. This is the future if you elect

Democrats.”

Bernard B. Kerik, a former New York City police commission­er who was pardoned by Trump for tax fraud earlier this year, amplified the point on Twitter. “It should be no surprise that every one of these cities that the anarchist have taken over, are the same cities run by leftist Democrats with the highest violence, murder and poverty rates,” he wrote on Twitter. “They can’t handle their cities normally, so how are they going to deal with this?”

Trump, who this past week retweeted a video of a supporter saying that “the only good Democrat is a dead Democrat” (though the supporter insisted he meant that in a political sense), picked up the theme Friday night and again on Saturday morning.

After crowds attacked CNN’S Atlanta headquarte­rs with rocks, the president offered no sympathy or condemnati­on. Instead, he made clear he thought it was just deserts for a network that has aggravated him so much.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? trump
trump

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States