Rash Putin tries to raze Ukraine
What has surprised me most about the history I have lived through is how often we get dragged on demented, destructive rides by leaders who put their personal psychodramas over the public’s well-being.
And it always feels as though we are powerless to stop the madness of these individuals, that we are trapped in their ego or libido or id or delusion.
Now comes the insanity of Vladimir Putin, the former KGB officer who has been feeling humiliated and furious ever since the red banner of the Soviet Union came down from the Kremlin 30 years ago.
To feed Cold War dreams, Putin spun a nuclear nightmare. He invaded a peaceful democracy, Ukraine, vowing consequences “you have never seen in your entire history” to those who interfered.
“Even by his logic, I don’t see how this ends well,” The New York Times’ Steven Lee Myers, a former Moscow correspondent who wrote “The New Tsar: The Rise and Reign of Vladimir Putin,” told me. “He conquers Ukraine and people declare him the tsar of all Russian lands? That’s not going to happen. There’s not even cheering in Russia like there was after the annexation of Crimea, which was done with almost no bloodshed. And I doubt a majority of Russians believe the propaganda about the imminent Nazi threat.” (Especially since the country is run by a Jewish comedian turned courageous president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy.)
As Julia Ioffe wrote in Puck, Putin stewed in his begrudging juices for decades and then rang down a new Iron Curtain: “Even as his forces were shelling the entirety of Ukraine — north to south, east to west — Putin made clear that his invasion wasn’t really about Ukraine. It was about the United States, about history and settling old scores, and rewriting the terms of surrender, 30 years later, that ended the Cold War.”
On Thursday, Putin tried to justify behaving like a war criminal, saying that Russia — i.e., Putin — was being treated in an “insolent,” “contemptuous” and “disdainful” way by the West.
In the midst of his “extraordinary, if predictable, doublespeak,” as The Times’ Roger Cohen called it, Putin draped the albatross of the unwarranted invasion of Iraq around America’s neck:
To prove that there were WMD in Iraq, Putin said, “the U.S. secretary of state held up a vial with white powder, publicly, for the whole world to see, assuring the international community that it was a chemical warfare agent created in Iraq. It later turned out that all of that was a fake and a sham, and that Iraq did not have any chemical weapons.” Hard to argue with that.
George W. Bush and Dick Cheney let their own egos, gremlins and grandiose dreams occlude reality. W. wanted to outshine his father, who had decided against going into Baghdad when he fought Saddam Hussein. And Cheney wanted to kick around an Arab country after 9/11 to prove that America was a hyperpower. So they used trumped-up evidence, and Cheney taunted Colin Powell into making that fateful, bogus speech at the United Nations, chockablock with Cheney chicanery.
Though Donald Trump was Putin’s lap dog, upending traditional Republican antipathy toward Russia, Putin could have been alluding to Trump in his speech Thursday when he accused the United States of “conartist behavior,” adding that America had become “an empire of lies.” Certainly, Trump was the emperor of lies.
As President Joe Biden marshaled world opinion against Putin, Trump offered nauseating praise of this murderer. Like the thug he so admires, Trump let his fragile ego and world-class delusions distort reality. Trump politicized COVID in a dangerous way. And, unable to accept the designation of Loser, he helped spread the lies and misinformation that led to Jan. 6. In a breathtaking betrayal, as the president of the United States, Trump abandoned the Constitution he was sworn to protect.
But if Biden got no backup on helping Ukraine from the quisling Trump, he did get a boost Friday from his inspiring Supreme Court nominee, Ketanji Brown Jackson, who reminded us, “The United States of America is the greatest beacon of hope and democracy the world has ever known.”
As for Putin’s Napoleonic megalomania, Russia expert Nina Khrushcheva summed him up best in a Vanity Fair podcast: “He’s a small man of 5-6 saying he’s 5-7.”