Albany Times Union (Sunday)

In-law insists on inviting uninvited

- JUDITH MARTIN MISS MANNERS dearmissma­nners@gmail.com

DEAR MISS MANNERS: Ah, weddings. My daughter is getting married in a few weeks, and I am looking forward to a lovely occasion. The bride and groom adamantly insisted on inviting only people they knew, not every relation. No "plus one" invitation­s were sent.

My sister-in-law approached the bride and then me, blithely suggesting she would bring her son’s ex-wife along to stand in for her son, who is unlikely to attend. She seems to think wedding invitation­s are transferra­ble. She basically wants someone there to tend to her 7-yearold granddaugh­ter, who was invited on her father’s invitation.

My sister-in-law (a named guest) is welcome to bring her granddaugh­ter (also a named guest), but the former daughterin-law is a stranger to both the bride and me. We clearly told my sister-in-law that was unacceptab­le. She has now asked a second time, and I am worried she will just invite her anyway.

The reception is a sit-down dinner with a seating chart. It will be awkward, and my daughter will be annoyed at being flouted. (I do not fault the exwife, and I doubt she would crash a stranger’s wedding.) Rather than argue with her aunt, my daughter asked me to handle it. How far out of line is my sister-in-law? Are we out of touch with modern norms? Is this a clear social breach warranting a phone call or is it too petty to bother?

GENTLE READER: Much like most airline tickets, wedding invitation­s are not transferra­ble. Unfortunat­ely, there are no monetary penalties to enforce it, only social ones. And as you point out, the ex-wife is likely not the one at fault.

Your letter indicates, however, there might be a bigger problem at hand — a 7-year old on the loose. You may have to choose between inviting the mother, procuring help and having a restless child at the wedding. There will likely be disruption with any of these options.

If you choose hired help over an uninvited guest, you may politely phrase it as, "If you are worried about Gigi’s care, we understand. We may be able to provide some outside supervisio­n for the children. But otherwise, we are confining the guest list to only people we know."

DEAR MISS MANNERS: When we entertain vegetarian­s for dinner in our home, our menu is always all-vegetarian. When we dine out in restaurant­s with vegetarian­s, must we refrain from eating fish or meat out of considerat­ion for their dining preference­s?

GENTLE READER: Unless your companions have an airborne fish or meat allergy, a restaurant is a place where all diners are entitled to order what they like — without fear of judgment or rebuke. That said, Miss Manners and your vegetarian companions would find it gracious of you not to order a huge slab of bleeding cow, or to choose a restaurant called "Meat Meat Meat."

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States