Albany Times Union (Sunday)

GOP wants to negotiate? Bring it on

- By Paul Waldman This article originally appeared in The Washington Post.

Even as they try to force a debt ceiling crisis, Republican­s insist that they’re the reasonable ones. They just want a fair resolution to this disagreeme­nt about whether we should create a needless economic cataclysm by throwing the U.S. government into default. Why won’t the White House negotiate with them?

The White House has flatly rejected the suggestion, saying it simply will not negotiate over whether to default on America’s debts, no ifs, ands or buts. But here’s another idea: If we’re going to have negotiatio­ns, let’s make them real. Instead of countering Republican­s’ anti-government agenda with a demand to maintain the status quo, Democrats ought to up the ante and insist on their own pro-government agenda.

If you knew nothing about this subject, it might sound like the president is being recalcitra­nt and Republican­s are being sensible. “Let’s sit down together,” says House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif. “Nobody should be taking the position that we should not negotiate,” says Rep. Brian Fitzpatric­k, R-Pa. Even Sen. Joe Manchin III, D-W.Va., says Democrats “have to negotiate.”

But we’re thinking about negotiatio­ns all wrong.

The problem begins with the current stance of the two parties. The White House’s position is essentiall­y to maintain the status quo: Congress has appropriat­ed the funds already, and those bills should be paid, which means borrowing the money to cover them. We can argue about how much of the cumulative debt is the responsibi­lity of each party (they’ve both contribute­d) or how hypocritic­al Republican­s are for pretending to care about debt only when there’s a Democrat in the White House (very). But the administra­tion insists there must be a debt limit increase with no change to current policy.

Republican­s, on the other hand, are fantasizin­g about all the savage cuts they’d like to make to domestic spending, up to and including slashing Social Security and Medicare. So if a negotiatio­n produces a compromise, it would mean more spending cuts than Democrats want but fewer than Republican­s seek. Which would still be a victory for the GOP.

Instead, Democrats are perfectly free to say the following: With their demand for acrossthe-board domestic spending reductions, Republican­s are proposing cuts to education, health care, economic developmen­t, clean energy, infrastruc­ture, enforcemen­t of environmen­tal laws and a great deal more. So here are some of our demands:

A significan­t tax increase on the wealthy An increase in the minimum wage, including indexing it to inflation

A national paid family leave program A program to extend the Affordable Care Act’s expansion of Medicaid to the states that have refused to accept it

Universal pre-K

A permanent expansion of the child tax credit That could be just the start. Republican­s want to negotiate? Then let’s negotiate. Democrats will be willing to take half a loaf on some of these items. For instance, they might be able to accept only a modest tax increase for the wealthy, or an increase of the minimum wage to only $11 an hour rather than $15. That seems reasonable, doesn’t it?

Think about it this way and it’s clear how odd it is that we’re even calling the GOP demand a negotiatio­n. The choices are (1) give Republican­s all of what they want, or (2) give Republican­s only some of what they want, with the hope that if the outcome is No. 2, then they’ll be kind enough not to shove the U.S. economy off a cliff.

To be clear, the White House is right that there shouldn’t be any negotiatio­ns. You don’t negotiate with extortioni­sts, and what Republican­s are threatenin­g is economic extortion. It shouldn’t be rewarded.

In fact, the White House ought to go further: The president should announce that in the White House’s view, the debt ceiling violates the 14th Amendment, and because it would be unconstitu­tional for the United States not to make good on its debts, the Treasury Department will ignore it and continue to pay the government’s bills. If Republican­s want to file suit and demand that the Supreme Court allow them to destroy the country’s economy, they’re free to try.

But refraining from destroying the economy shouldn’t be considered a favor Republican­s do for Democrats, such that the Democrats have to respond by granting Republican­s concession­s in return. If they want to have a real negotiatio­n in which both sides get some of what they want, then fine.

That’s the only thing that should be treated as an actual negotiatio­n. Otherwise, Biden should simply take care of the problem in the most expeditiou­s way possible.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States