Be loyal to travel brands only when it’s sensible

Travel brand loyalty is nothing new. Ever since Texas International Airlines and American Airlines created the first frequent-flier programs in the late 1970s and early 1980s, travelers have been racking up miles, seeking elite status and pouring airfare dollars into brands that offer the most perks.

Yet sticking with a single airline, hotel or rental car program comes with built-in limitations. A person who’s loyal to, say, Delta Air Lines might pay $100 more for a flight on Delta in order to earn miles and status. Is that trade-off worth it?

“It has to be a really good deal for me to fly with another airline,” said Joanne Herd, travel adviser at Girasole Travel, a luxury travel booking service. She has been loyal to American Airlines for years.

She recently took a business-class flight with Singapore Airlines because it cost thousands of dollars less than those available on an American Airlines partner.

“I almost regretted it because I barely made the status I wanted,” she said.

Navigating these tradeoffs is particularly fraught for semi-frequent travelers, who may not travel enough to earn high-level elite status perks, but still want to earn and use miles. Collecting a few hundred points from a smattering of loyalty programs might be more trouble than it’s worth, yet sticking with one program can limit travel options.

Here’s how to decide whether going monogamous with a travel brand makes sense.

Big payoffs

Travel brands like United Airlines and Marriott maintain their loyalty programs for a simple reason: They want to attract big spenders, particularly business travelers. To this end, loyalty programs will lavish benefits on travelers in proportion to how frequently they travel.

It affects the value of these programs for ultrafrequent travelers relative to leisure travelers. For example, a traveler with the lowest-level Hilton status will get $2 back in value for every $100 they spend, according to a NerdWallet analysis, while someone with the highest-level status will get $49 in value for every $100 they spend.

This is an enormous gulf, and highlights how the juice might not be worth the squeeze for low-level status. Katy Nastro, a travel expert at flight deals website Going, emphasized the same goes for airline elite status, which disproportionately rewards high rollers.

“It takes a lot of short flights to even reach the lowest rung of the ladder,” Nastro said. “So you may be foregoing cheaper — and quite possibly better flights — for the potential of a reward in the future.”

Other trade-offs

While limiting one’s loyalty to a single travel brand can offer benefits, it also has hidden drawbacks. Claire Sturzaker, who writesthe Tales of a Backpacker blog, began traveling full-time seven years ago. Yet despite her bona fide frequent traveler status, she mostly avoids loyalty programs and the elite status rat race.

“I want something different when I travel. That’s why I travel,” she said. “I would rather stay at a small guest house. I know money is going back into the community where I am, rather than a giant global corporation.”

Sturzaker acknowledged chain brand hotels offer reliability and convenience, but said those aren’t her top priorities. And she likes to visit off-the-beaten-path destinations, where no single airline alliance flies. Instead, she tries to fly nonstop with budget airlines whenever possible.

So, who should bother with travel elite status programs? Those who are frequent business travelers. Semi-frequent travelers who take a few trips per year might see some benefit from loyalty, but these perks are often offset by the increased cost of limiting one’s choices.

And sticking with a single brand might make you miss the most magical aspect of travel — the unexpected.

“I stayed at a familyrun place in a small village in Honduras, run by a husband and wife and three boys,” Sturzaker said. “There was a power outage during my stay, so we all just sat around and chatted. That would never happen at a Hilton.”