Albany Times Union (Sunday)

The Biden presidency, Phase II

-

What is the Biden administra­tion for? If you had asked me that question in 2021, I would have said the Biden administra­tion’s chief purpose is to narrow the economic chasm. America is bitterly divided between highly educated people who live in places that are thriving and less educated people who live in places that are left behind. That economic and social divide threatens our politics, our shared prosperity and the nation’s social fabric.

In its first two years, the administra­tion successful­ly began to tackle this fundamenta­l problem. Through the infrastruc­ture law and many other measures, Team Biden directed huge amounts of money to create working-class jobs and to increase benefits to working-class families. That spending contribute­d to white-hot labor markets that have lifted wages, brought people back into the labor force and turbocharg­ed American capitalism.

Yes, inflation surged. Yes, the nation is still bitterly divided. But things would have been immeasurab­ly worse if the struggling places were left to founder in the same economic mire. The Biden policies were more than worth it.

If you ask me now what the Biden administra­tion is for, my answer would be different. Today, its main purpose is to prepare the nation for a period of accelerati­ng and explosive change.

Writing in Tablet magazine this week, the scholar and columnist Walter Russell Mead notes that there have been three periods of transforma­tional change over the course of human history: the Neolithic period, which brought about settled farming, writing and the birth of cities; the Industrial Revolution, which gave us factories, mass production and cars; and the informatio­n age.

Until a few years ago, the informatio­n age seemed like the least consequent­ial of the three. Computers and TikTok are nice, but they haven’t produced the kind of societyalt­ering transforma­tions we saw during the other two civilizati­onal turning points.

That seems to be changing. The informatio­n age is accelerati­ng and growing more disruptive. The first cause is artificial intelligen­ce. AI will produce pervasive breakthrou­ghs and threats that none of us can now predict. Another cause is the emerging cold war with China. This will produce a remorseles­s technologi­cal competitio­n that will turbocharg­e developmen­ts in biotech, energy, chip manufactur­ing, trade flows, political alliances and many other spheres.

We’re living in the first stages of what my colleague Thomas Friedman a few years ago called “the age of accelerati­on,” an age of both stunning advances and horrific dislocatio­ns. This is a period of radical uncertaint­y, a period in which prediction­s are likely to be wrong and midrange plans are likely to become obsolete. We’re going to need government­s that are able to pivot quickly and throw tidal waves of money at suddenly emerging problems, from technologi­cally driven mass unemployme­nt to war in the Pacific.

When COVID hit, the United States successful­ly pivoted and threw trillions of dollars at that problem. But the United States may not be able to mobilize that kind of response in the future. That’s because we’re now manacled by debt.

During the Trump administra­tion, the debt increased by roughly $7.8 trillion, and during the Biden administra­tion, it has increased by about $3.7 trillion. Over the past 50 years, the annual federal deficit has averaged about 3.5% of GDP. Over the next 10 years, the Congressio­nal Budget Office expects that deficits will average 6.1% of GDP.

The United States is projected to spend roughly $640 billion this year merely paying interest on that debt, a figure that is expected to more than double by 2033. Any prudent family saves money as hurricane season approaches, so it can deal with the coming storms. With self-destructiv­e recklessne­ss, the United States is doing the exact opposite.

Seen from this perspectiv­e, the debt ceiling fight looks different. Yes, it’s insane that Republican­s are playing a game of chicken that could send the world economy into turmoil. But the fact is that the debt ceiling has often been an occasion to put a brake on excessive spending. Of the past 43 debt limit increases or suspension­s, 27 were attached to other legislatio­n, according to Maya MacGuineas of the Committee for a Responsibl­e Federal Budget. Republican­s play this game harder, but Democrats have played it too.

Given the historical circumstan­ces, President Joe Biden should absolutely negotiate with Republican­s over a debt reduction deal.

Yes, Republican­s are being reckless. But the central truth remains: We need to bring down deficits so that we have the flexibilit­y and resources to handle the storms ahead.

There are many ways to do this. I would favor a progressiv­e consumptio­n tax that could be raised or lowered as the coming turmoil rages and ebbs.

But first, Biden has to redefine his presidency to keep up with emerging realities. It’s not 2021 anymore. We’re entering an era of rapid transforma­tion. In contrast to Donald Trump, who is all about himself, Biden can be the source of security in times of chaos. For that to happen, we need a government that is fiscally sound and ready for anything.

 ?? ?? DAVID BROOKS
DAVID BROOKS

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States