Albany Times Union

Medical care

Drug prices soar under prescripti­on plan loophole

- By Ricardo Alonsozald­ivar

Congress eyes cap on out-ofpocket costs of medication for Medicare recipients

With health care a top issue for American voters, Congress may actually be moving toward doing something this year to address the high cost of prescripti­on drugs.

President Donald Trump, Democrats trying to retire him in 2020, and congressio­nal incumbents of both parties all say they want action. Democrats and Republican­s are far apart on whether to empower Medicare to negotiate prices, but there’s enough overlap to allow for agreement in other areas.

High on the list is capping out-of-pocket costs for participan­ts in Medicare’s popular Part D prescripti­on drug program, which has a loophole that’s left some beneficiar­ies with bills rivaling a mortgage payment.

The effort to cap outof-pocket costs in Medicare’s prescripti­on plan is being considered as part of broader legislatio­n to restrain drug prices.

Limits on high medical and drug bills are already part of most employerba­sed and private insurance. They’re called “outof-pocket maximums” and are required under the Obama-era health law for in-network services. But Medicare has remained an outlier even as prices have soared for potent new brand-name drugs, as well as older mainstays such as insulin.

“The issue has my attention,” said Sen. Charles Grassley, R-iowa, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, which oversees Medicare. “Out-ofpocket costs are a concern of ours, particular­ly at the catastroph­ic level.” His committee has summoned CEOS from seven pharmaceut­ical companies to a hearing Tuesday.

While Grassley said he hasn’t settled on a specific approach, the committee’s top Democrat, Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, recently introduced legislatio­n that would cap out-of-pocket costs at about $2,650 for Medicare beneficiar­ies taking brand-name drugs. One co-sponsor is Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a Democratic presidenti­al candidate.

In Des Moines, Iowa, retired special education teacher Gail Orcutt is battling advanced lung cancer due to radon exposure. Although she has Medicare prescripti­on coverage, she paid $2,600 in January for her cancer medication and will pay about $750 monthly for the rest of the year. She said it cost more last year for a different drug — $3,200 initially and then about $820 monthly.

Someday her current drug may stop working, said Orcutt, and then she’d have to go on a different medication. “What if that is two or three times what I’m paying now?” she said. “It’s not sustainabl­e. The country needs more problem-solving for the common good and not the corporate bottom line.”

At a recent House Ways and Means Committee hearing, three expert witnesses with varied policy views concurred on limiting drug costs for Medicare beneficiar­ies. “This is still the only program that does not provide that protection to its beneficiar­ies,” testified economist Joe Antos of the businessor­iented American Enterprise Institute. The House committee also oversees Medicare.

Before the hearing, the committee’s chairman and top Republican released a joint statement unusual in polarized times: “We agree that the time is now to take meaningful action to lower the cost of prescripti­on drugs in the U.S. health care system,” said Reps. Richard Neal, D-mass., and Kevin Brady, R-texas.

 ?? Charlie Neibergall / Associated Press ?? Retired public school teacher Gail Orcutt, of Altoona, Iowa, looks over some of the prescripti­on drugs she takes. Orcutt pays $2,600 the first month of the year, and then $750 each month afterward for a lung cancer medication.
Charlie Neibergall / Associated Press Retired public school teacher Gail Orcutt, of Altoona, Iowa, looks over some of the prescripti­on drugs she takes. Orcutt pays $2,600 the first month of the year, and then $750 each month afterward for a lung cancer medication.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States