Albany Times Union

The enemies with familiar faces

In Jordan Peele’s “Us,” a family must contend with their horrifying doubles

- By Mick Lasalle Hearst Newspapers

“Us” is a jumble of ideas, and they aren’t clear ideas. People will see in it what they like, and they will give it an intellectu­al coherence it doesn’t possess. But, really, the thing to like best about “Us” is its messiness. Writerdire­ctor Jordan Peele throws a lot at his audience in this one, perhaps as a way of concealing his film’s true meaning from himself.

This is a more-serious work than his previous film, “Get Out,” and it’s a surprising departure. “Get Out,” though enjoyable, was almost too obvious in its intention, too transparen­t in its thinking. “Us” is wonderfull­y confused, a horror film that taps into unconsciou­s terrors, within the audience and probably within the filmmaker, as well.

Lupita Nyong’o — she’s terrific in this — plays an upper-middle class wife and mother who, as a young girl, had something very weird happen to her. Inside a haunted house along the Santa Cruz boardwalk, she ran into her doppelgang­er. Instead of dismissing the incident as a hallucinat­ion or a mirror effect, she still thinks about it 30 years later. All the same, when her husband (Winston Duke) insists on taking the whole family for a long Santa Cruz weekend, she goes along

with it, despite misgivings.

Peele takes his time in these early scenes. He rolls it out slowly, introducin­g the couple’s bickering friends, Kitty (Elisabeth Moss) and Josh (Tim Heidecker). Kitty reveals that, like John at the bar in the old Billy Joel song, she believes she could have been a movie star. It takes a special kind of an actress who can say that and seem completely ridiculous, without us rememberin­g, until later, that it’s an actual movie star saying the line.

And then the long night begins. Adelaide (Nyong’o) tells her husband that her uneasiness has become unbearable, that they and their two kids need to pack up and leave immediatel­y. But it’s too late. The doppelgang­ers are standing outside the house — one for father, one for mother, one for sister, one for brother.

A word about the doppelgang­ers. They’re not monsters. They’re human. They live undergroun­d, and they’re described as shadow people. The implicatio­n is that everyone has one. And these shadow people are not nice. They’re feral. They’re wild, animalisti­c, irrational. And their voices are terrifying. Nyong’o and Peele come up with a voice for Adelaide’s doppelgang­er; a heaving, scraping, breathless sound that chills the blood.

As for what happens next, that’s best left discovered in the watching. But just knowing this much, it’s clear that Peele has hit on something that has wide metaphoric­al applicatio­n. Some will insist on seeing “Us” as a movie about the American underclass. Peele probably wants people to think that, because at one point, Adelaide’s doppelgang­er says, “We are America.”

But that’s Peele playing to the crowd, trying to give critics and audiences a hook, some notion that there’s a higher social purpose behind the proceeding­s. But if you think it through, that interpreta­tion doesn’t make complete sense. It’s good as an allusion, as an echo of a thought, but only that. Obviously, not every successful person has an unsuccessf­ul doppelgang­er living in torment. Even if you take that to mean that every successful person has someone similar living in misery, that has no impact even as metaphor.

The doppelgang­er idea can also be looked it in psychiatri­c terms, that the doppelgang­er is the id, the wild, suppressed part of the self that lives undergroun­d, unseen. And again, that’s a nice idea to have floating around the movie, but it doesn’t quite line up allegorica­lly, because the id is an unconsciou­s motivator of human behavior, not something completely separate from the self.

Adelaide is Peele’s main character, the one that expresses his viewpoint and that, for all intents and purposes, is him within the story. And so, at one point, he has Adelaide go undergroun­d, into the tunnels. He has her, in a sense, penetrate the unconsciou­s world, which is depicted as unreal, a pristine and barren place populated by fat and contented rabbits. It’s a brilliant sequence, in which she ultimately must do battle with herself.

So, “Us” is not about America, though it is, a little; and it’s not about the unconsciou­s, though it’s slightly that, too. What it’s really about is a newly and phenomenal­ly successful artist contemplat­ing his own American story. It’s about the guilt that comes with success, as well as the horror that it might have gone another way and the fear that it could still go away.

Last time, Peele made a movie about the country. This time he made a movie about himself, and it’s even better.

 ?? Claudette Barius / Universal Pictures via AP ?? Lupita Nyong’o in “Us,” written, produced and directed by Jordan Peele.
Claudette Barius / Universal Pictures via AP Lupita Nyong’o in “Us,” written, produced and directed by Jordan Peele.
 ?? Claudette Barius / universal Pictures via AP ?? from left, Lupita nyong’o, Winston duke and evan Alex in “us.”
Claudette Barius / universal Pictures via AP from left, Lupita nyong’o, Winston duke and evan Alex in “us.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States