Albany Times Union

Unions protect workers’ hard-earned benefits

- By Paul F. Cole

On June 27, 2018, the Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that public-sector unions could not collect a fee from nonmembers for services the union provides to all members of a collective bargaining unit, even though unions are required to provide those services under the law.

Since the decision, corporatef­unded anti-union forces have launched an aggressive offensive urging public employees to withdraw their membership. One organizati­on, New Choice NY, has been targeting Capital Region employees through direct contact and expensive newspaper ads complete with withdrawal forms.

It is important to unmask who New Choice NY is and what its true agenda really is.

The organizati­on claims to be an “independen­t, nonprofit, nonpartisa­n effort,” but it is actually affiliated with Americans for Fair Treatment and the Commonweal­th Foundation. These groups are part of the State Policy Network, a web of rightwing think tanks and tax-exempt groups in 49 states, Puerto Rico and the United Kingdom. It is one of many organizati­ons funded by the Charles G. Koch Foundation and other corporate interests.

SPN has been a key player in support of right-to-work campaigns in a number of states. Two of its associate members, the Liberty Justice Center and National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, funded the recent Janus v. AFSCME case that was designed to weaken public-sector unions throughout the nation.

Following the Supreme Court’s ruling on Janus, SPN and its affiliates have organized a massive effort to convince union members to stop paying dues through media advertisin­g as well as through direct mail and phone contacts. New Choice NY is a subsidiary of Americans for Fair Treatment, which is an associate member of SPN.

While SPN argues that its goal is to protect workers’ “First Amendment rights of free speech and freedom of associatio­n,” its internal communicat­ions tell a far different story. Speaking about the Janus case, SPN president and CEO Tracie Sharp said, “Once this ruling comes down — and we expect it to come down in our favor — everything will change. The door to pass a dream list of free-market reforms is going to open for us.”

Scott Hagerstrom, the Michigan director of the SPN affiliate Americans for Prosperity, which was chaired nationally by David Koch, said, “We fight these battles on taxes and regulation­s but really what we would like to see is to take the unions out at the knees so they don’t have the resources to fight these battles.”

This agenda was further unmasked when Wisconsin state Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald explained that “this battle” is about eliminatin­g unions so that “the money is not there” for the labor movement.

The sheer irony of the New Choice NY ad, which appeared in the Times Union, was its point that workers will be able to keep “Your Pension, Your Healthcare, Your Benefits, Your Raises.” Does any employee really believe that they would enjoy these hard-earned benefits if it was not for their union? For reference, compare benefits in New York with those in states without a strong public sector voice for workers.

The ultimate effect of weakening a union by diminishin­g its membership base is not a road to “freedom and prosperity,” as these right-wing, anti-union organizati­ons assert, but a path to the past when employees had no voice in determinin­g the terms and conditions of employment. The real losers will be the workers and their families.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States