Albany Times Union

Greene County solar farm debated

- By Rick Karlin

Coxsackie Almost half of the electricit­y from a proposed 400-acre solar farm here is under contract to go to Connecticu­t. That was one of the arguments by opponents of the Hecate Greene County Solar Facility during a virtual public statement session on the plan Tuesday before the state Board on Electric Generation Siting and the Environmen­t.

Of the 50 megawatts envisioned in the project, 30 are allocated to projects with the New York State Energy Research and Developmen­t Authority with 20 going to two buyers in Connecticu­t.

Those who oppose the project noted the 20 MW in Connecticu­t wouldn’t help New York meet its ambitious carbon reduction goals, since the power would go out of state.

“We don’t want our landscape scarred so politician­s in New York and Connecticu­t can brag about their green energy bonafides,” said Leslie Albright.

The developers see it differentl­y. “Clean air and climate change don’t know state boundaries,” Gabe Wapner, Hecate Energy’s director of developmen­t, told the Times Union after the hearing.

He said that the Connecticu­t buyers came forward before New York to contract for the energy. Like other solar developers, they needed energy sale commitment­s to move ahead.

The export also points to another reality about green power and climate change. While the New York projects are being prompted by the state’s 2019 Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act, which mandates sharp reductions in carbon emissions by 2030, other states have similar plans. Connecticu­t, for instance, has an executive order also calling for sharp reductions by 2030.

Aside from the export, opponents of the project say they worry about how it would impact real estate values as well as bird habitat.

Albright added that Hecate is planning another large solar farm, the Flint Mine project to the north of Greene County, in Albany County.

“There is no process to consider the siting of multiple plants in one community,” added Albright.

Other speakers, though, said they favor the plan because of its green energy, the revenue it would generate in the town and the benefits it would bring to the Sleepy Hollow Lake housing developmen­t.

By supplantin­g some of the cropland that surrounds the man-made Sleepy Hollow lake, the solar project would cut back some of the runoff that has created worries about algae blooms, said Kenneth Gifford, president of the Sleepy Hollow Lake Property Owners Associatio­n.

Several farmers and relatives of farmers who would lease property to the solar developer added that the revenue would allow them to continue farming, rather than sell their property off to developers. The area has seen a housing boomlet lately, especially with the COVID -19 pandemic sending New York City residents scrambling to buy homes upstate.

Others noted the scenery and landscape of the region has changed over the years, from farmland to a more residentia­l nature as people developed properties and built houses.

“My family has been on this land for several hundred years,” said farmer James Taylor, who favors the project and like others spoke about his longstandi­ng multigener­ational roots in the community. “They never came and asked us if we like to look at all the houses built in the area,” he said, referring to those who have put up homes in recent years.

The Greene County project applicatio­n was deemed “complete” by the state’s siting board earlier in September and needs to be decided upon in a year’s time. Wapner said they hope to begin constructi­on by the end of 2021.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States