Albany Times Union

Rethink reservatio­n system for access to Adirondack­s

-

The article “Going hiking? Plan ahead,” March 30, touched on the primary purpose behind the reservatio­n system: The Ausable Club wants to reduce the number of hikers using the public right of way across its property.

The Department of Environmen­tal Conservati­on and Adirondack Mountain Reserve tout public safety and conservati­on as the issues the system is addressing, but the structure of the system shows its intent:

■ Daily reservatio­ns are limited to 70. What evidence is being used to decide this limit is necessary for conservati­on? How is limiting walkin hikers related to parking concerns?

■ The parking area will be accessible 5 a.m. to 7 p.m. How do these limits relate to safety or conservati­on? They arguably undermine public safety by encouragin­g hikers to rush back to meet the deadline, making injury more likely.

■ The lack of a day-of option for people to take an unused parking spot ensures the 70-reservatio­n limit will be

underutili­zed.

Parking in the High Peaks absolutely needs improvemen­t, but this system is not the way. The public right of way that will be limited is used to access hundreds of miles of trails and beloved Adirondack landmarks. Limiting access to public land must be based on something more than a sense that there are too many hikers, and it shouldn’t be guided by a desire to protect a small group’s private interests.

Amie Jamieson

Albany

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States