Info to come on Ukraine nuclear plant
IAEA director expects to produce “full picture” of damage assessment
ZAPORIZHZHIA, Ukraine — Fighting raged Friday near Europe’s biggest nuclear power plant in a Russian-held area of eastern Ukraine, as experts from the U.N.’S nuclear watchdog agency assessing damage expressed concern over the facility’s “physical integrity.”
International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Rafael Grossi said he expects to produce a report “early next week, as soon as we have the full picture of the situation by the end of the weekend, more or less.”
Speaking to reporters in Vienna after returning from the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, he said he will brief the U.N. Security Council on Tuesday.
“We’ve seen what I requested to see — everything I requested to see,” Grossi said, adding that his big concerns were the plant’s “physical integrity,” the power supply to the facility and the situation of the staff.
“The military activity and operations are increasing in that part of the country, and this worries me a lot,” he said. “It is obvious that the statistical possibility of more physical damage is present.”
He noted that shelling started in August and “it is quite clearly a more recent trend,” but didn’t apportion blame for damage that has been done so far.
Local Russian-appointed authorities said Friday that staff at the plant restarted a key reactor just hours after a shelling attack a day earlier forced it to shut down. Ukraine’s nuclear energy operator, Energoatom, confirmed on its Telegram channel that the
reactivated reactor had been plugged back into the power grid.
The head of Ukraine’s powerful National Security Council said work was underway to ensure Ukraine’s power supply in case connection to the Zaporizhzhia site is lost this winter. Oleksiy Danilov also said Ukrainian authorities weren’t fully aware of the situation inside the plant for now — despite the presence of the team from the U.N.’S International Atomic Energy Agency that went in Thursday.
In an interview with The Associated Press, Danilov — a key official in Ukraine’s war effort — said Kyiv didn’t know whether the plant might have been mined by the Russians, adding: “I want to emphasize that this is a challenge for the whole world, how to make this nuclear facility not dangerous.“
Aleksandr Volga, the Kremlinbacked mayor of Enerhodar,
where the Zaporizhizhia nuclear power plant is located, told the Interfax news agency Friday that the successful reactivation left the plant with two working reactors, out of a total of six.
Russia and Ukraine traded blame for the shelling attack which led to Thursday’s temporary shutdown of the reactor by its emergency protection system. Energoatom said the shelling damaged a backup power supply line used for in-house needs, and one of the plant’s reactors that wasn’t operating was switched to diesel generators.
Britain’s Defense Ministry said earlier Friday that shelling continued in the area near the power plant, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s office said Russian shelling damaged houses, gas pipelines and other infrastructure in the Nikopol region on the other bank of the Dnieper River — part of the
fighting in several areas of eastern and southern Ukraine overnight.
The IAEA, braving gunfire and artillery blasts along their route, crossed the front lines to reach the Zaporizhzhia plant on Thursday.
Russia and Ukraine traded accusations that the other side was trying to impede the work of the IAEA experts, or control the message.
Zelenskyy, in his nightly address on Thursday, had tough words for the IAEA delegation. While applauding its arrival at the plant, he said independent journalists were kept from covering the visit, allowing Russians to present a one-sided, “futile tour.”
In a conference call with reporters on Friday, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Moscow considered “positively” the arrival of the mission, “despite all problems and difficulties caused by the Ukrainian side’s provocative actions.”
The 14-member delegation arrived in a convoy of SUVS and vans after months of negotiations to enable the experts to pass through the front lines.
Grossi said Friday that six of the agency’s experts remain at the plant, and there will be a “permanent presence on site ... with two of our experts who will be continuing the work.”
He wasn’t specific about how long exactly the two experts will stay.
“The difference between being there and not being there is like day and night,” he said.
The plant has been occupied by Russian forces but run by Ukrainian engineers since the early days of the six-month war.
Ukraine alleges Russia is using the plant as a shield to launch attacks. On Friday, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu rejected the Ukrainian allegations and said Russia has no heavy weapons either on the site or in nearby areas.
Shoigu said Ukrainian forces have fired 120 artillery shells and used 16 suicide drones to hit the plant, “raising a real threat of a nuclear catastrophe in Europe.”
Before the IAEA team arrived, Energoatom, Ukraine’s state nuclear power company, said Russian mortar shelling had led to the shutdown of one of its reactors by its emergency protection system and had damaged a backup power supply line used for in-house needs.
Energoatom on Friday accused Russian forces of “making every effort” to prevent the IAEA mission from getting to know the facts on the ground.
Elsewhere in Ukraine on Friday, Zelenskyy’s office said four people were killed and 10 injured over the last day in the eastern Donetsk region, a key hub of the Russian invasion.