Albany Times Union

New York needs a new foundation aid formula

- ▶ Michael A. Rebell is executive director of the Center for Educationa­l Equity at Teachers College, Columbia University. He also was co-counsel for plaintiffs in CFE v. State of New York and NYSER v. State of New York. By Michael A. Rebell

In her executive budget, Gov. Kathy Hochul indicated that the state will now finally keep its commitment to fully fund the foundation aid formula for education that was enacted in 2007, and which was supposed to have been fully funded in 2011. However, the state’s 16-year delay has rendered the existing formula badly out of date.

What is needed now is a total reconsider­ation of the current needs of schools throughout the state and the developmen­t of a new formula that realistica­lly accounts for them. The Legislatur­e must prioritize developmen­t of a new foundation aid formula.

How did we get here? In 2003, the Court of Appeals held in CFE v. State of New York that the state was in violation of Article XI of the state constituti­on, which requires the provision of adequate, equitable funding to ensure that every child receives a “meaningful opportunit­y” to obtain a “sound, basic education.” In 2006, the state Education Department developed the foundation aid formula to comply with the court’s order; the Legislatur­e adopted the formula, with only minor changes, in 2007.

Although funding for the first two years went largely according to schedule, following the Great Recession of 2008, the Legislatur­e first froze further increases and then, when the federal stimulus money ran out, cut the school aid budget substantia­lly. School districts have been trying to obtain the funds to which they were entitled for the past 12 years. After parents and education stakeholde­rs filed another lawsuit (NYSER v. State of New York), the governor and the Legislatur­e committed in 2021 to pay out the remaining increases by 2023-2024.

The result is that the current formula uses census data from 2000 in its poverty counts and regional cost-of-living data from 2006. It hasn’t kept current with

the dramatic demographi­c changes and enrollment drops that have occurred over the past 16 years, nor has it taken into account the huge rise in the number of homeless students, learning loss from the pandemic, and other new educationa­l needs.

The process for developing this new formula must be based on economic and educationa­l expertise, it must be transparen­t, and it must also fully and fairly consider input from parents and other education stakeholde­rs. To do this, the state needs to establish a profession­ally staffed standing commission to develop and monitor the implementa­tion of the new formula. The commission should be a permanent body that can analyze current educationa­l requiremen­ts, suggest cost-effective means for meeting them, and propose changes as they become necessary in the future.

The Center for Educationa­l Equity at Teachers College has proposed establishi­ng a 15-member commission whose membership would consist of appointees by the governor, the legislativ­e leaders, and the Board of Regents, as well as representa­tives of the major education and profession­al organizati­ons, business leaders, advocacy groups, parents, and students. It should also include educators with expertise in serving students with special needs, including students who are homeless, have disabiliti­es, or are learning English as a new language.

To develop an equitable and adequate funding system for the 2024-25 fiscal year, the commission needs to be establishe­d promptly, so that its recommenda­tions can be prepared and presented to the governor and the Legislatur­e by next winter. Accordingl­y, even in advance of adoption of the full budget on April 1, the Legislatur­e needs to approve an immediate appropriat­ion to establish and staff such a commission. Our students’ futures depend on our elected officials responding quickly and appropriat­ely to this need.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States