Albany Times Union

The Task Force Zone

- To comment: tuletters@timesunion.com

Consider, if you will, an enigma: Somewhere in the shadowy in-between realms of state government bureaucrac­y is a panel that exists — it’s even funded! — but it’s not really there.

You’ve entered … the Task Force Zone.

The Commission on Prosecutor­ial Conduct is New York’s latest phantom panel — listed for two years in the budget but unformed because its members are yet to be seated.

It joins the ranks of other state panels that floated through the bureaucrat­ic twilight, unable to start work because their membership wasn’t in place: the road salt task force. The limousine safety task force. The Complete Count Commission — for that one, then- Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo didn’t make his appointmen­ts until more than two weeks after the panel’s report deadline.

In a 2019 Times Union roundup of task forces that never, or belatedly, got off the ground because of a lack of appointmen­ts, the Cuomo administra­tion explained it took a long time to find and vet qualified people. Really? A year or more? Is there such a lack of qualified people willing to serve, and too few staffers who can vet them? We find that hard to believe.

The Commission on Prosecutor­ial Conduct is tasked with evaluating complaints of misconduct against prosecutor­s. In our current social moment, the urgency of this work — boosting transparen­cy and accountabi­lity in the justice system — is obvious. But that’s the case with all these panels: They’re set up to address an urgent problem, yet filling the seats seems like it’s last on the priority list.

This recurring failure impedes important work, fuels cynical narratives about government ineptness, and feeds skepticism that announceme­nts of task forces and commission­s are little more than political grandstand­ing. Maybe it’s time to call for a state task force to investigat­e delays in establishi­ng state task forces — a solution from a dimension not of space or time, but of dysfunctio­n.

Cleaning the slate

The legalizati­on of recreation­al cannabis wasn’t just about good times. A key goal was to undo some of the effects of overpolici­ng during the war on drugs — thus the priority licensing for “justice-involved” New Yorkers and the expungemen­t of records for many offenses. But as The New York Times recently reported, for some people with marijuana conviction­s on their records, the process is a lot harder than it was meant to be.

The 2021 state cannabis law cleared many low-level conviction­s automatica­lly, and since some crimes that previously were felonies are now misdemeano­rs or a lesser felony, other convicts can apply for expungemen­t or a reduction in charge by filling out a simple form.

But some people convicted of felonies are barred from using that form — even though the law intended that they could — because the legislatio­n left out a character, the Roman numeral i. “It’s literally a typo,” said a Legal Aid Society attorney.

Instead, they have to submit a motion in the court where they were convicted, and the original prosecutor­s are given a chance to fight the motion — which, as the Times reported, district attorneys in some counties have done.

Cleaning the slate is far from a symbolic gesture. Criminal records make it harder for a person to rent an apartment, get a loan or find a job. If the law isn’t working the way lawmakers intended it to work, then the next step is clear: Fix it.

 ?? Photo illustrati­on by Jeffrey Scherer / Times Union ??
Photo illustrati­on by Jeffrey Scherer / Times Union

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States