Albuquerque Journal

The administra­tion that lost its ‘juice’

- CHARLES KRAUTHAMME­R Copyright, Washington Post Writers Group; e-mail to letters@charleskra­uthammer.com.

WASHINGTON — Fate is fickle, power cyclical, and nothing is new under the sun. Especially in Washington, where after every election the losing party is sagely instructed to confess sin, rend garments and rethink its principles lest it go the way of the Whigs. And where the victor is hailed as the new Caesar, facing an open road to domination.

And where Barack Obama, already naturally inclined to believe his own loftiness, graciously accepted the kingly crown and proceeded to ride his re-election success to a crushing victory over the GOP at the fiscal cliff, leaving a humiliated John Boehner & Co. with nothing but naked tax hikes.

Thus emboldened, Obama turned his inaugural and State of the Union addresses into a left-wing dream factory, from his declaratio­n of war on global warming (on a planet where temperatur­es are the same as 16 years ago and in a country whose CO2 emissions are at a 20-year low) to the invention of new entitlemen­ts — e.g., universal preschool — for a country already drowning in debt.

To realize his dreams, Obama sought to fracture and neutralize the congressio­nal GOP as a prelude to reclaiming the House in 2014. This would enable him to fully enact his agenda in the final two years of his presidency, usually a time of lame-duck paralysis. Hail the Obama juggernaut.

Well, that story — excuse me, narrative — lasted exactly six months. The Big Mo is gone.

It began with the sequester. Obama never believed the Republican­s would call his bluff and let it go into effect. They did.

Taken by surprise, Obama cried wolf, predicting the end of everything we hold dear if the sequester was not stopped. It wasn’t. Nothing happened.

Highly embarrasse­d, and determined to indeed make ( bad) things happen, the White House refused Republican offers to give it more discretion in making cuts. Bureaucrat­s were instructed to inflict maximum pain from minimal cuts, as revealed by one memo from the Agricultur­e Department demanding agency cuts that the public would feel.

Things began with the near-comical cancellati­on of White House tours and ended with not-socomical airline delays. Obama thought furious passengers would blame the GOP. But isn’t the executive branch in charge of these agencies? Who thinks that a government spending $3.6 trillion a year can’t cut 2 percent without furloughin­g air traffic controller­s?

Looking not just incompeten­t at managing budgets but cynical for deliberate­ly injuring the public welfare, the administra­tion relented. Congress quickly passed a bill giving Obama reallocati­on authority to restore air traffic control. Having previously threatened to veto any such bill, Obama caved. He signed.

Not exactly Appomattox, but coming immediatel­y after Obama’s spectacula­r defeat on gun control, it marked an administra­tion that had lost its “juice,” to paraphrase a charming question at the president’s news conference.

For Obama, gun control was a political disaster. He invested capital. He went on a multicity tour. He paraded grieving relatives. And got nothing. An assault-weapons ban — a similar measure had passed the Congress 20 years ago — lost 60-40 in a Senate where Democrats control 55 seats. Obama failed even to get mere background checks.

All this while appearing passive, if not helpless, on the world stage. On Syria, Obama was nervously trying to erase the WMD red line he had so publicly establishe­d. On Benghazi, he stonewalle­d accusation­s that State Department officials wishing to testify are being blocked.

He is even taking heat for the Boston bombings. Every day brings another revelation of signals missed beforehand. And his post-bombing pledge to hunt down those responsibl­e was mocked by the scandalous Mirandizin­g of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, gratuitous­ly shutting down informatio­n from the one person who knows more than anyone about possible still-existent explosives, associates, trainers, future plans, etc.

Now, the screw will undoubtedl­y turn again. If immigratio­n reform passes, Obama will be hailed as the comeback kid, and a new “Obama rising” narrative proclaimed.

This will overlook the fact that immigratio­n reform has little to do with Obama and everything to do with GOP panic about the Hispanic vote. In fact, Obama has been asked by congressio­nal negotiator­s to stay away, so polarizing a figure has he become.

Nonetheles­s, whatever happens, the screw will surely turn again, if only because of media boredom. But that’s the one constant of Washington political life: There are no straight-line graphs. We live from inflection point to inflection point.

And we’ve just experience­d one. From king of the world to dead in the water in six months. Quite a ride.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States