Albuquerque Journal

TRANSPAREN­CY is a vital characteri­stic of a good leader

In the absence of truth, mistrust and rumor take over

- BY JOYCE E.A. RUSSELL

R ecently, we had the pleasure of hosting Indra Nooyi, chief executive of PepsiCo at University of Maryland’s Robert H. Smith School of Business. In her comments, she talked about many characteri­stics of effective leaders, and one of them was the importance of having strong communicat­ion skills and being transparen­t to employees.

If you think about it, the lack of good communicat­ion is probably one of the largest reasons why there are morale or voluntary turnover problems in an organizati­on. Talk to any leader or employee and you will discover a disconnect between what leaders think they are communicat­ing and what employees say they are hearing.

What do we mean by transparen­t leadership? Essentiall­y, it means there is clear and consistent communicat­ion and a commitment to creating an open, honest, candid workplace with trust at the core of the culture. If employees don’t know what is happening around them, they have the tendency to misunderst­and or misread the leaders’ intentions and possibly think the worst. Rumors take the place of facts.

As authors Adrian Gostick and Chester Elton noted in their book “All In: How the Best Managers Create a Culture of Belief and Drive Big Results,” “People inevitably build a backstory for leadership decisions, and whether they trust you or not is the most significan­t determiner of whether that story will be positive or negative. In the workplace, only 36 percent of employees believe their leaders operate with integrity and honesty. And the number one reason employees say they act unethicall­y is because their boss models that behavior for them.”

When a firm does not have trust or transparen­cy, not only are there employee problems (low morale, productivi­ty, commitment and loyalty), but also employees will undoubtedl­y pass that along to their clients or customers by treating them poorly.

On the other hand, firms with a transparen­t culture are more successful since employees feel free to come up with more creative solutions, they share issues before they become major problems, and they are more engaged, motivated and productive at work.

What you can do

So, what can leaders do to ensure there is effective communicat­ion in the organizati­on?

Help employees see the larger picture of what is happening in the organizati­on.

If you share informatio­n with your managers, make sure they are also sharing the informatio­n with their employees. Leaders often

Share good, bad informatio­n consistent­ly, directly

think that informatio­n is being cascaded down, but then discover that employees never got the message or got something else entirely. Usually they discover this when employees bring up complaints about not knowing what is going on.

To be effective at cascading communicat­ions, leaders need to make sure that everyone leaves a meeting knowing exactly what they will tell their people, and those managers need to communicat­e the message in a timely manner, preferably face to face.

Make sure all senior leaders are “on board” with a message. If they aren’t, there will be inconsiste­ncies in how things are being communicat­ed to employees.

Meet directly with employees on a quarterly basis to address any gaps in communicat­ion. Ask for their input as well. Now, more than ever before, employees want to actually see leaders so they can read

“A LACK OF TRANSPAREN­CY RESULTS IN DISTRUST AND A DEEP SENSE OF INSECURITY.” — DALAI LAMA

their nonverbal expression­s when they share news. Not only are they looking for the facts; but also how sincere the leader is.

Use a weekly email newsletter or another similar mechanism to share informatio­n to all employees so they are hearing it directly from the top.

Over-communicat­e the message over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. Patrick M. Lencioni, author of “The Advantage: Why Organizati­onal Health Trumps Everything Else in Business,” says employees won’t believe what they have heard unless it is consistent­ly repeated seven times. Yet, as he notes, leaders often only share their message once, assuming people will get it the first time or they will get insulted if you keep repeating the message.

But often employees don’t get it; hence leaders need to become “chief reminding officers” and keep repeating their message in different situations so that employees can emotionall­y internaliz­e the message. Or, they need to also have other leaders share the same message so employees hear the same thing from multiple sources.

When sharing informatio­n with managers, prepare them to address tough questions from employees. Otherwise, they may offer glib responses such as “that’s the way it is; the boss said so” which can really damage trust in senior leaders.

Set up upward channels of communicat­ion. Periodical­ly collect feedback from employees through focus groups, surveys, etc., to learn what’s on their minds. Make sure they are able to share this feedback in a confidenti­al and anonymous way.

As issues are being raised, make sure to note these so you can come back to addressing them later to show how you are handling them.

Be consistent in the messages you are sharing with different audiences.

Follow through on commitment­s you make. This builds trust with employees.

Involve employees in the decisions that affect them. Have them be part of the decision-making if possible.

Face the facts head-on even if the facts will be tough to hear. Suppose you have budget cuts, it is better for employees to hear it directly from the leader than to hear it from rumors.

Admit when you are wrong and apologize when you make mistakes. No one is perfect and employees will appreciate your honesty.

Keep employees posted when news comes in, whether good or poor.

Creating a transparen­t culture is not easy, and it needs to be something that is continuall­y worked on. This will go a long way to ensuring that there is transparen­t communicat­ion at the organizati­on.

 ??  ?? Informatio­n, whether good or bad, is best heard coming from the boss. The authors of “All In” say that “only 36 percent of employees believe their leaders operate with integrity and honesty.”
Informatio­n, whether good or bad, is best heard coming from the boss. The authors of “All In” say that “only 36 percent of employees believe their leaders operate with integrity and honesty.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States