Albuquerque Journal

Court of Appeals marks 50 years of innovation

Created as a relief valve for the Supreme Court, the panel is first stop for most appeals

- Judge M. Monica Zamora and Judge Michael D. Bustamante are judges on the New Mexico Court of Appeals. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the judge individual­ly and not those of the court.

Today is the 50th anniversar­y of the creation of the New Mexico Court of Appeals.

In 1965, the State Legislatur­e approved a proposed constituti­onal amendment to create an intermedia­te court of appeals. The Legislatur­e acted because the State Supreme Court’s burgeoning case load was resulting in unacceptab­le delays in the dispositio­n of appeals.

Voters overwhelmi­ngly approved the amendment in a special election on Sept. 28, 1965.

The Legislatur­e funded the new court in 1966, specifying that the new judges would take office on April 1, 1966.

The first judges selected by Gov. Jack M. Campbell were LaFel E. Oman (Las Cruces); E. G. Hensley, Jr. (Portales); Waldo Spiess (Albuquerqu­e); and Joe W. Wood (Farmington).

Increasing caseloads required periodic enlargemen­t of the court. A fifth position was authorized in 1972 and two more seats were created in 1978. The last expansion occurred in 1991, resulting in the court’s current 10 members.

The court conducted its first oral argument in December 1966, and its first opinion was filed on Dec. 12, 1966.

Fifty years after the first appeal was filed with the court, appeal number 35,450 was just docketed.

Since 1966, 42 judges have served on the court. Of those 42, 10 have been women. On Jan. 1, 1979, Judges Mary C. Walters and Leila Andrews were sworn in as the first female judges on the court, and the first female appellate court judges in New Mexico. Both judges were graduates of the University of New Mexico School of Law.

The jurisdicti­on of the court was initially limited to tort cases, workers’ compensati­on matters, non- capital criminal actions, violations of municipal or county ordinances involving fines and appeals from a few administra­tive agencies.

The range of cases heard by the Court has steadily increased. For example, 20 years ago, the Supreme Court transferre­d jurisdicti­on over cases involving contract claims to the court.

The court is now the appellate court of first resort for all direct appeals from district courts and most administra­tive agencies, except for matters reserved to the Supreme Court by the New Mexico Constituti­on. The court processes more than 900 cases per year.

Normal caseload growth, combined with the court’s broadening jurisdicti­on, soon created a backlog similar to that which prompted the court’s creation. The court responded with several innovative experiment­s designed to make the appellate process more efficient and less costly — for the court and for litigants.

For example, the court pioneered the use of recorded trial proceeding­s in lieu of typed transcript­s. The court was given permission to issue unpublishe­d, non-precedenti­al opinions in selected cases in place of more elaborate formal, published opinions. The court was instrument­al in drafting new comprehens­ive rules of appellate procedure standardiz­ing how appeals were perfected from all district courts and agencies.

These innovation­s continue place today.

Also in place — and a large part of the court’s effort to meet its workload — is its summary calendar system. The system is a kind of legal triage designed to identify those cases that can be resolved without full briefing. A nationally recognized approach to prompt case management, the summary calendar program accounts for almost 60 percent of the court’s decisions.

A significan­t percentage of the

in court’s cases are also resolved through its in-house mediation program.

Started in the late ’90s, and based on the federal 10th Circuit Court of Appeals model, the mediation program results in settlement­s in an average of 40 cases per year.

Settlement­s, of course, reduce the number of opinions the court must write and provide certainty to the parties.

Looking outside the confines of its courtrooms in Santa Fe and Albuquerqu­e, the court is actively engaged in holding oral arguments in high schools throughout the state. Starting in Roswell some 25 years ago, the court has held arguments in Hobbs, Grants, Las Vegas, Farmington, Belen, Los Lunas, Laguna and Acoma Pueblos, Espanola, Santa Fe and a number of schools in the Albuquerqu­e metro area.

With the help of the local attorneys, these events bring the judicial branch to life for students as part of the curricula in their schools.

The court also enjoys a collaborat­ive relationsh­ip with UNM School of Law. The judges and legal staff speak to various classes, serve as professors and adjunct professors, judge practice moot court sessions and provide externship­s for the students. Two judges also teach an appellate law class with the curriculum specifical­ly focused on the appellate process.

The Court looks forward to continuing these efforts in its ongoing service to the public of New Mexico.

 ?? KIM JEW PHOTOGRAPH­Y ?? Members of the New Mexico Court of Appeals: FRONT ROW (L to R): Judge Jonathan Sutin, Judge James Wechsler, Chief Judge Michael E. Vigil, Judge Michael Bustamante and Judge Roderick Kennedy. BACK ROW (L-R): Judge J. Miles Hanisee, Judge Timothy Garcia,...
KIM JEW PHOTOGRAPH­Y Members of the New Mexico Court of Appeals: FRONT ROW (L to R): Judge Jonathan Sutin, Judge James Wechsler, Chief Judge Michael E. Vigil, Judge Michael Bustamante and Judge Roderick Kennedy. BACK ROW (L-R): Judge J. Miles Hanisee, Judge Timothy Garcia,...
 ??  ?? JUDGE MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE
Judge for Yourself
JUDGE MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE Judge for Yourself
 ??  ?? JUDGE M. MONICA ZAMORA
Judge for Yourself
JUDGE M. MONICA ZAMORA Judge for Yourself

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States