Albuquerque Journal

Researcher­s slowly homing in on risk of Zika birth defect

Microcepha­ly isn’t the only danger

- BY MIKE STOBBE AP MEDICAL WRITER

NEW YORK — As the internatio­nal epidemic of Zika virus disease has unfolded and led to devastatin­g birth defects for at least 1,300 children in eight countries, an agonizing question has persisted: What is the chance that an infected pregnant woman will have a baby with these defects?

Researcher­s don’t yet have a complete answer, but they are slowly homing in on one.

The largest study to ever look at the question says the risk of one especially severe type of birth defect is “substantia­l” — in the range of 1 percent to 14 percent. It also reinforces the understand­ing that women infected in the early stages of pregnancy face the greatest risk.

The range is so unusually wide because researcher­s are relying on imprecise and incomplete informatio­n as they to try to quickly estimate the level of risk in advance of what they say is likely transmissi­on of Zika by mosquitoes in the United States later this year.

The study focused on what was seen in just one place, a state in northeast Brazil. And it looks only at microcepha­ly, a condition in which a baby’s skull is much smaller than expected because the brain hasn’t developed properly. But health officials say Zika can cause other birth defects, too.

“These numbers are probably only the tip of the iceberg,” said Dr. Neil Silverman, a UCLA professor of obstetrics who has been advising the California Department of Public Health on Zika issues.

A study done in Rio de Janiero published earlier this year suggested there is a nearly 30 percent risk for all kinds of Zika-related birth defects and fetal death. The new research doesn’t necessaril­y contradict that, said Silverman, who was not involved in the latest research.

The new study was done by government scientists at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It was published online Wednesday by the New England Journal of Medicine.

The Zika virus causes only a mild and brief illness, at worst, in most people. But in the last year, infections in pregnant women have been strongly linked to fetal deaths and to potentiall­y severe birth defects, mostly in Brazil. Last month, the CDC said there was enough evidence to declare that Zika causes microcepha­ly and other brain defects.

The virus is spread mainly through the bite of a tropical mosquito called Aedes aegypti. The bug can be found in the southern United States, but there’s no evidence that they’ve been spreading the virus here yet.

The new study is based on about 400 babies with microcepha­ly in the Brazilian state of Bahia, who were diagnosed between July and February.

The researcher­s made estimates based on what data they could get, but faced challenges. For example, they weren’t certain all 400 microcepha­ly cases were correctly diagnosed. They didn’t know for sure how many of the mothers of the affected children had a Zika infection, nor how many pregnant women in Bahia in total were infected with Zika virus during that time period.

But based on other data from Bahia and from two earlier Zika outbreaks, they could make calculatio­ns that accounted for different scenarios — including one which assumed most people were infected and another in which Zika infections were less common.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States