Albuquerque Journal

Background check plan ineffectiv­e

Universal background checks on gun transfers would infringe on owners’ rights and would not reduce crime

- BY GAYLE DYE PRESIDENT, NEW MEXICO SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATIO­N

A recent op-ed column by Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America called on New Mexico lawmakers to pass universal gun background check legislatio­n, making it seem that such legislatio­n will eliminate future horrendous shootings. Law-abiding gun owners in New Mexico join the rest of the nation in sharing the outrage resulting from these appalling acts.

The nation does need to find a way to keep firearms out of the hands of those few who are responsibl­e for America’s violent rampages. However, universal background checks will not solve the problem.

The proposed legislatio­n is an intrusive and ineffectiv­e gun control proposal that targets law-abiding citizens while doing nothing to stop criminals.

Universal background check laws criminaliz­e virtually all private firearms transfers, costing law-abiding gun owners time, money and freedom.

This latest gun control activity mirrors recent actions of New York billionair­e and former mayor Michael Bloomberg in pushing his gun control agenda across the country; New Mexico is just the latest target.

Under his gun control laws, virtually every sale, purchase, trade, gift, rental or loan of a firearm must go through a licensed dealer.

For example, to loan a buddy a shotgun to go hunting for the weekend, both friends would have to go to a federally licensed dealer, undergo a background check, and pay a fee (in some states, there is no cap on how much that could be). To return the shotgun, both would have to go through the whole process again, including paying the fee.

This same scenario would occur if a man wanted to loan his girlfriend his pistol to defend herself from a stalker. Under universal background check laws, law-abiding citizens are turned into criminals or left defenseles­s.

Criminolog­ists and economists alike have researched the effects of expanded background checks and found they do nothing to reduce violent crime.

Politifact said: “… Analysts urged caution in interpreti­ng a correlatio­n in lower rates of gun violence to private-sale background checks.”

Jacquelyn White, a psychology professor at the University of North Carolina Greensboro, offered similar advice.

Even law enforcemen­t rejects the notion of such a proposal.

In 2013, nearly 80 percent of active and retired law enforcemen­t surveyed by PoliceOne said that a ban on private gun transfers would not reduce violent crime.

This proposal will do precious little to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. A U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics survey of prison inmates found that 77 percent acquired crime guns from illegal sources such as theft, black market and straw purchases. Only 0.8 percent came from gun shows. Interestin­gly, persons denied under the current background check system were not prosecuted under existing federal law. A 2012 report to the U.S. Department of Justice showed only 62 out of 70,000 felony cases were prosecuted in the year studied.

The topic of how to deter suicidal individual­s from using firearms requires much more research and input from mental health specialist­s. At present there is virtually no informatio­n in the NICS database to reflect a buyer’s state of mind.

Gun control advocates are demanding an expansion of background checks instead of increased prosecutio­ns for violations because this is part of their move towards the ultimate goal – firearm registrati­on. A 2013 internal U.S. Department of Justice memo stated that the effectiven­ess of universal background checks depends on requiring gun registrati­on.

Criminals won’t register their guns, and a universal background check law will never be enforceabl­e without registrati­on.

New Mexico’s crime problem is a result of a broken criminal justice system that keeps returning the same violent offenders to the streets to commit violent crimes repeatedly. As Election Day nears, please determine which candidates have solid proposals that target these criminals, rather than feel-good solutions that would only cost law-abiding citizens time, money and freedom.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States