Albuquerque Journal

GOP eyeing rolling back regulation­s

Lawmakers have 60 days to act

- BY REMA RAHMAN CQ-ROLL CALL

WASHINGTON—Congressio­nal Republican­s are poised to apply an infrequent­ly used legislativ­e gambit to formally disapprove of — and likely roll back — a host of federal regulation­s adopted since June on President Barack Obama’s watch.

Rules dealing with disparate issues from overtime pay to federal funding for Planned Parenthood are being touted as targets for eliminatio­n under the Congressio­nal Review Act, a vestige of the House GOP’s “Contract With America” that allows lawmakers to use a simple majority vote to rescind a regulation within 60 legislativ­e days of publicatio­n. The law has only been successful­ly used once in its 20-year history.

Precisely how much the GOP can accomplish remains unclear. While Republican­s will have control of the White House and both chambers of Congress, resolution­s brought up under the act to strike individual rules will have to vie for time with President-elect Donald Trump’s early agenda items and Senate confirmati­on votes on his Cabinet nominees. Some experts believe conservati­ves will nonetheles­s try to seize the opportunit­y to whittle away at Obama’s legacy.

“We would have a new Republican government with a new Republican majority with a deregulato­ry bent aimed at undoing Democratic initiative­s,” said Sarah Binder, a senior fellow at the liberal-leaning Brookings Institutio­n.

The Heritage Foundation, a conservati­ve think tank, said the efforts to use the Congressio­nal Review Act come at a time when ”the stars seem aligned.”

Lawmakers have 60 legislativ­e days from the time a rule is finalized to pass resolution­s of disapprova­l. The resolution­s either have to be signed into law by the president or enacted over his veto by two-thirds of both houses of Congress. House lawmakers could act until May 17 at the latest, according to the current 2017 calendar.

The Congressio­nal Research Service determined that rules that have become final under the Obama administra­tion since June 13 could qualify for Congressio­nal Review Act disapprova­l. But Obama foes won’t have many successful precedents to draw on as they try to scotch the so-called midnight regulation­s.

Since its enactment in 1996, the Congressio­nal Review Act has only been used to kill one regulation. In 2001, former President George W. Bush signed a resolution that overturned an Occupation­al Safety and Health Administra­tion rule issued at the end of the Clinton administra­tion, dealing with workplace ergonomic standards.

That was the last time the executive and legislativ­e branches were controlled by Republican­s following a Democratic presidenti­al administra­tion — the same scenario that will play out after Trump is inaugurate­d this month.

Trump could opt to act unilateral­ly and reverse some Obama regulation­s through executive orders. Congress could also choose to overturn some agency rules through the customary legislativ­e process. But the Congressio­nal Review Act is seen by some as an expedited process that limits debate and does not allow for amendments.

Diane Katz, a senior research fellow of regulatory policy at The Heritage Foundation, said while the act is a useful tool to address executive overreach, the remedy, generally speaking, should be creating a better regulatory process in which the legislativ­e branch has a stake.

Katz said Congress for too long, under Democratic and Republican control, hasn’t used its oversight power properly.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States