Albuquerque Journal

Russian spy ship cruises East Coast

Ship seen 30 miles off Groton sub shipyard

- BY NICHOLAS RONDINONE AND EDMUND H. MAHONY THE HARTFORD COURANT

GROTON, Conn. — Officials are tracking a Russian spy ship that cruised up the East Coast to within 30 miles of the U.S. Naval Submarine Base in Groton Wednesday in what some lawmakers called another aggressive action from Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“A Russian spy ship patrolling 30 miles from the Groton sub base underscore­s that the threats posed by a resurgent Russia are real,” U.S. Rep. Joe Courtney, D-Conn., said in a written statement.

Two retired U.S. Navy submarine commanders downplayed the significan­ce of the Russian presence, saying the ship presents little threat to U.S. security.

The U.S. Coast Guard said it is tracking the ship’s course, but would not disclose the precise location.

“The U.S. Coast Guard is aware of a Russian Federation-flagged vessel transiting internatio­nal waters off the East Coast of the United States, as we are of all vessels approachin­g the U.S. The ship has not entered U.S. territoria­l waters, which extend 12 miles out to sea,” the Coast Guard said in a statement. “We respect freedom of navigation exercised by all nations beyond the territoria­l sea of a coastal state consistent with internatio­nal law. The Coast Guard continues to coordinate with federal agency partners to monitor maritime contacts operating in the vicinity of U.S. shores.”

The ship began the trip north along the coast from Havana, where it was photograph­ed and is expected to return.

Lawmakers, noting recent incidents including Russian planes “buzzing” a Navy ship in the Black Sea, point to this ship’s actions as yet another aggressive Russian action.

“They are doing this obviously with aggressive intent to say the least. … This is part of a pattern of what’s going on right now, not just off the East Coast of the U.S., but overseas,” Courtney, whose district includes Groton, said on the House floor Wednesday morning.

“We’ve been in touch with the Navy early this morning,” Courtney told The Hartford Courant. “They are watching it like a hawk. At this point there’s not a violation of internatio­nal waters. Unless that happens you aren’t going to see any aggressive push-back, but it’s something that has us on high alert.”

Two retired senior submarine commanders said Wednesday that in their opinions, such a Russian spy ship has little ability to pry into U.S. secrets and there is no reason for alarm.

“This is for show,” said retired Rear Adm. Ron Thunman, former deputy chief of naval operations for submarine warfare. “I mean, what could that thing do to us? It doesn’t have anything special that I know of today — of course, I’ve been out of it for a few years — but don’t know of any specialize­d equipment that they could use to intercept our classified communicat­ions.

“The only thing they could get out of the radio circuitry is normal commercial traffic,” said Thunman, who played cat-and-mouse games with the Russians throughout his career as a commander of submarines and submarine groups around the world. “Any sort of classified traffic that we have goes by classified circuits and they can’t get into it.”

Thunman said reports of Russian military aircraft buzzing U.S. Naval ships elsewhere in the world is far more troubling than the presence of a Russian ship in internatio­nal waters near New England.

Retired Cmdr. David Candler, who spent his career serving on and commanding submarines based in Groton, agreed.

“I wouldn’t make a mountain out of a molehill,” Candler said. “It’s a ship, but it’s not the Great White fleet. And it is not uncommon for all kinds of ships from all kinds of places to be all over the world. A military ship up here all by itself is kind of unusual. But these kinds of ships — and we do the same thing — go all over the place to stay reasonably accustomed to the waters.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States