Albuquerque Journal

Tax cut implicatio­ns

Stampede of individual taxpayers likely to reclassify as LLCs

- BY DAVID KOCIENIEWS­KI

NEW YORK — The Trump administra­tion’s proposal to cut the tax rate on partnershi­ps and limited liability companies (LLCs) could set off a stampede of individual taxpayers trying to reclassify themselves as so-called pass-through businesses to take advantage of the savings, according to tax experts.

Call it the Kansas problem. In 2012, Kansas exempted pass-throughs from state income taxes, a move that was billed as a chance to spur so much business growth and job creation that it would actually raise money for the state treasury. Instead, an unexpected­ly large number of taxpayers began calling themselves pass-throughs, and state tax revenues fell by hundreds of millions of dollars. Kansas lawmakers passed a bill to eliminate the exemption, which was derided as the “LLC loophole,” but Gov. Sam Brownback vetoed the measure.

Now, Trump’s administra­tion wants to try a similar move. Passthroug­h businesses — which include small businesses like corner stores and free-lancers but also doctors, lawyers, consultant­s and vastly profitable hedge funds — get their name from the way they file taxes: The businesses pass their income through to their owners, who then pay tax based on their individual income-tax rate.

The top individual income-tax rate is now 39.6 percent, though Trump’s plan would cut that to 35 percent. But for pass-through businesses, he’d cut it even more: to just 15 percent.

Cue the rush among highearnin­g individual­s to recast themselves as LLCs, sole proprietor­ships or other pass-throughs. “Absolutely!” said J. Richard Harvey, a tax law professor at Villanova University and a former senior official at both the IRS and the Treasury Department. “If a taxpayer has a choice between paying at a 15 percent top rate versus a 35 percent rate, the taxpayer and their tax planners will be working feverishly to take advantage of the 15 percent rate.”

Trump’s plan was applauded by many small-business groups and Republican­s, who say it would remedy an inequity in the current tax code, which taxes corporatio­ns at a maximum rate of 35 percent, while subjecting much pass-through business income to the 39.6 percent individual rate. Trump’s initiative would apply the same 15 percent rate to pass-throughs and multinatio­nal corporatio­ns.

“We support efforts to treat America’s small business community just as their corporate counterpar­ts and that requires an equal playing field when it comes to our tax system,” The National Associatio­n for the Self-Employed, which advocates on behalf of the 27 million Americans who file their taxes as self-employed, said in a written statement.

But many tax-fairness advocates say that comparison is mathematic­ally unsound. In addition to the current 35 percent tax on corporate profits, any dividends paid by corporatio­ns are also taxed as investment income received by the shareholde­rs who collect them, at rates up to 23.8 percent. But pass-through income is taxed only once, said Chuck Marr, director of federal tax policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

“The notion that this plan would achieve parity is a false comparison,” Marr, a former economic adviser to Senate Democrats and the Clinton White House, said. “Most of the savings of this change would go to the wealthiest businesses and the top 1 percent. But politician­s love to stand up and say they are defending small businesses, so I fear it’s an argument that isn’t going away.”

Meanwhile, budget hawks worry that the steep cut would cause massive increases to the federal deficit — as much as $1.5 trillion over the next decade, according to the conservati­ve Tax Foundation.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States