Albuquerque Journal

States debating whether to comply with voter fraud commission

Over half have agreed to submit at least some data from voter rolls

- BY KATISHI MAAKE MCCLATCHY

WASHINGTON — Further playing into the polarizing political divide heightened by President Donald Trump’s administra­tion, states are finding themselves having to take a stance on whether to divulge sensitive voter informatio­n to Trump’s new voter integrity commission.

So far, 29 states have agreed to comply in whole or in part with the June 28 request from Kris Kobach, a Republican and Kansas secretary of state. Kobach, who last month announced he’s running for governor and is known for his aggressive approach to voter fraud, is leading Trump’s commission. But the ways in which secretarie­s of state and governors are communicat­ing their plans to the public differ greatly.

Consider Missouri and North Carolina, both of which agreed to provide Kobach with whatever public data is already available.

“This informatio­n is regularly given out by states,” said Missouri Secretary of State Jay Johnson, a Republican, in an interview. “The thought process is to get this data and look at it in a comprehens­ive and bipartisan manner.”

North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper, a Democrat, said: “My staff has told the State Board of Elections that we should not participat­e in providing sensitive informatio­n beyond what is public record as it is unnecessar­y, and because I have concerns that it is an effort to justify the president’s false claims about voter fraud.”

Tomas Lopez, counsel in the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, said he’s also worried about what the commission would do with the informatio­n.

“Right now, we have something that looks — unfortunat­ely — politicize­d,” Lopez said. “We have the concern this body is going to come out with ideas that lead to more bad laws.”

A privacy group, the Electronic Privacy Informatio­n Center, this week filed a lawsuit seeking a temporary restrainin­g order to halt the request for informatio­n.

Trump created the Presidenti­al Advisory Commission on Election Integrity commission after signing an executive order in May to stamp out alleged widespread voter fraud that he claims cost him 3 million to 5 million votes in the election.

Democrat Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in November by more than 2 million votes but lost the Electoral College. There has been no evidence of widespread voter fraud.

Trump’s commission issued informatio­n requests to all 50 states and the District of Columbia on June 28, demanding that state government­s turn over voter roll data, including full names of registered voters, their addresses, party affiliatio­n, last four digits of Social Security numbers and voting history dating back to 2006, among other things.

Of the 29 states that have agreed to give part of the requested informatio­n, 12 said they would only offer publicly available data on certain conditions, which include purchasing the informatio­n or making it clear how the data would be used. Those states are: Alabama, Georgia, Iowa, Louisiana, Oregon, Pennsylvan­ia, Wisconsin, Indiana, Nebraska, Montana, Connecticu­t and Vermont.

Sixteen states and D.C. have fully rejected the commission’s request, with five still waiting to render their decisions.

The states rejecting the request are: Arizona, California, Delaware, District of Columbia, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachuse­tts, Minnesota, Mississipp­i, New Mexico, New York, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia and Wyoming.

Those yet to offer a decision are: Idaho, Illinois, New Jersey, West Virginia and Hawaii.

Media reporting on how many states have complied with the commission’s request has been mixed, and Kobach took notice this week, lambasting reports saying 44 states outright refused to hand over voter data.

“These reports are patently false, more ‘fake news,’” Kobach said in a White House press release Wednesday. “Despite media distortion­s and obstructio­n by a handful of state politician­s, this bipartisan commission on election integrity will continue its work to gather the facts through public records requests to ensure the integrity of each American’s vote because the public has a right to know.”

States such as Missouri, Texas and Florida chose to fulfill the commission’s request, citing state law.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States