Albuquerque Journal

UNM students learning how to curb sexual misconduct

Training is part of the agreement with DOJ

- BY JESSICA DYER JOURNAL STAFF WRITER

Nearly 16,000 students at the University of New Mexico’s main campus have participat­ed in training meant to curb sexual misconduct, and the university is planning to reach thousands more by year’s end to ensure compliance with its U.S. Department of Justice agreement.

UNM signed the agreement a year ago today in the wake of a 16-month DOJ investigat­ion into how the state’s largest university handled sexual assault cases. Its requiremen­ts include that the university administer “The Grey Area” training program to all undergradu­ates — with a few exceptions — by the end of the 2017 fall semester.

The 1½- to 2-hour training covers “healthy relationsh­ips, ‘hooking up,’ consent, bystander interventi­on and sexual assault,” plus reporting options and UNM policy, according

to UNM’s website.

So far, 13,982 have taken it, according to a progress report UNM sent to the DOJ on Monday.

Graduate and profession­al students must take a specific version of “The Grey Area” training by Dec. 31; UNM says 1,954 have completed it.

UNM has more than 26,000 students enrolled this semester, but some are exempted from the training based on their limited course loads or presence on campus or their involvemen­t in non-degree-granting programs. Officials could not say Monday exactly how many students still need the training, but “we anticipate training several thousand additional students with the dozens of sessions still scheduled before the end of the year,” Libby Washburn, chief of staff and chief compliance officer, said in a written statement.

UNM also has not determined how it will enforce the training requiremen­t; Washburn said the school will decide early next year how to handle students who failed to participat­e.

The progress report — which was not mandated by the agreement — comes one year into the three-year agreement UNM signed after the DOJ determined the university was not complying with laws that prohibit sex discrimina­tion and had discombobu­lated policies on sexual misconduct and a confusing reporting structure.

More than 90 percent of UNM’s faculty, staff and student employees in 2016 took an online training course titled “Intersecti­ons: Preventing Discrimina­tion and Harassment,” according to the report.

Employees who deal more specifical­ly with sexual misconduct cases, like campus police and Office of Equal Opportunit­y staff, have completed a combined 1,500 hours of additional training in areas related to Title IX, rape crisis and “trauma informed investigat­ion,” according to the new report.

“In the past year, UNM has made substantia­l progress in complying with the delineated tasks and implementi­ng improvemen­ts,” the report states.

But the report also acknowledg­es the scope of the challenge. Despite the progress, UNM “has more work to do in attempting to change attitudes and behaviors,” it says.

Officials are also revising policies related to sexual misconduct and equal opportunit­y, and plan to put them out for comment this academic year, and bolstering staffing ranks in areas like training and advocacy.

Meeting the terms and the added staff will cost an estimated $1.5 million during the three-year agreement, UNM said in a news release.

If the DOJ determines UNM is not complying with terms, the parties have 60 days to reach a resolution. If that does not happen, the department “may initiate civil enforcemen­t proceeding­s in federal court,” according to the agreement.

Compliance has not come without controvers­y — some professors have opposed a UNM policy that requires all faculty members to file reports with the Office of Equal Opportunit­y when they are told about any sexual violence involving a student. The Faculty Senate objected in a formal resolution that says “scholarly research” shows that mandatory reporting can have a negative impact on victims.

Interim president Chaouki Abdallah has convened a task force to look at the employee reporting requiremen­ts; it “may suggest changes” to the policy, according to the report.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States