Albuquerque Journal

Abortion counseling limitation to be revived

- BY JILL COLVIN AND RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR

WASHINGTON — The Trump administra­tion will resurrect a Reagan-era rule that would ban federally funded family planning clinics from discussing abortion with women, or sharing space with abortion providers.

The Department of Health and Human Services will be announcing its proposal today, a senior White House official said Thursday, speaking on condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to confirm the plans before the announceme­nt.

The policy has been derided as a “gag rule” by abortion rights supporters and medical groups, and it is likely to trigger lawsuits that could keep it from taking effect. However, it’s guaranteed to galvanize activists on both sides of the abortion debate ahead of the congressio­nal midterm elections.

The Reagan-era rule never went into effect as written, although the Supreme Court ruled that it was an appropriat­e use of executive power. The policy was rescinded under President Bill Clinton, and a new rule went into effect that required “non-directive” counseling to include a range of options for women.

Doctors’ groups and abortion rights supporters say a ban on counseling women about a legal medical procedure trespasses on the doctorpati­ent relationsh­ip. They point out that federal family planning funds cannot be currently used to pay for abortion procedures.

Abortion opponents say a taxpayer-funded family planning program should have no connection whatsoever to abortion.

“The notion that you would withhold informatio­n from a patient does not uphold or preserve their dignity,” said Jessica Marcella of the National Family Planning & Reproducti­ve Health Associatio­n, which represents family planning clinics. “I cannot imagine a scenario in which public health groups would allow this effort to go unchalleng­ed.”

But Kristan Hawkins of Students for Life of America said, “Abortion is not health care or birth control and many women want natural health care choices, rather than hormone-induced changes.”

Abortion opponents allege the federal family planning program in effect cross-subsidizes abortion services provided by Planned Parenthood, whose clinics are also major recipients of grants for family planning and basic preventive care. Hawkins’ group is circulatin­g a petition to urge lawmakers in Congress to support the Trump administra­tion’s proposal.

Known as Title X, the nation’s family-planning program serves about 4 million women a year, at a cost of about $260 million.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States