Albuquerque Journal

Lack of paper trail after voting concerning

Many still fear Russian hacking

-

ATLANTA — As the midterm congressio­nal primaries heat up amid fears of Russian hacking, roughly 1 in 5 Americans will cast ballots on machines that do not produce a paper record of their votes.

That worries voting and cybersecur­ity experts, who say lack of a hard copy makes it difficult to double-check results for signs of manipulati­on.

“In the current system, after the election, if people worry it has been hacked, the best officials can do is say, ‘Trust us,’ ” said Alex Halderman, a voting machine expert and director of the University of Michigan’s Center for Computer Security and Society.

Georgia, which holds its primary on Tuesday, and four other states — Delaware, Louisiana, New Jersey and South Carolina — exclusivel­y use touchscree­n machines that provide no paper records allowing voters to confirm their choices.

Such machines are also used in more than 300 counties in eight other states: Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississipp­i, Pennsylvan­ia, Tennessee and Texas, according to Verified Voting, a nonprofit group focused on ensuring the accuracy of elections.

In all, about 20 percent of registered voters nationwide use machines that produce no paper record.

Many election officials in states and counties relying on those machines say they support upgrading them but also contend they are accurate. In many jurisdicti­ons, the multimilli­on-dollar cost is a hurdle.

The focus comes as states gear up for the first nationwide elections since Russian hackers targeted 21 states ahead of the 2016 presidenti­al contest. U.S. intelligen­ce agencies have said no evidence exists of any tallies being manipulate­d, but that Russians and others are intent on interferin­g in American elections again.

Last week, the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee issued a report that recommende­d replacing machines that don’t produce a paper record of the vote.

Some states have already taken that step or are doing so.

Virginia last year banned paperless touchscree­n machines two months before the state’s gubernator­ial election. This year, Kentucky ordered that all new machines produce a paper trail.

Congress has allocated $380 million to help states with election security upgrades, but that is just a fraction of what would be needed to replace all paperless machines.

Louisiana is soliciting bids to replace the state’s nearly 10,000 such machines ahead of the 2020 election, though all the money has yet to be allocated. Funding is also an issue in Pennsylvan­ia.

The rest of the country uses either paper ballots filled out by hand, then read by an optical scanner, or a touchscree­n machine that prints out a ballot so voters can verify their selections before inserting it into another machine to record their votes.

 ?? DAVID GOLDMAN /ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? A new voting machine that prints a paper record is on display at a polling site in Conyers, Ga., in October. Georgia officials have estimated it could cost over $100 million to adopt the machines statewide.
DAVID GOLDMAN /ASSOCIATED PRESS A new voting machine that prints a paper record is on display at a polling site in Conyers, Ga., in October. Georgia officials have estimated it could cost over $100 million to adopt the machines statewide.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States