Albuquerque Journal

Jury: NCAA did not defame former USC coach

McNair loses lawsuit linked to Bush scandal

- BY NATHAN FENNO LOS ANGELES TIMES

LOS ANGELES — A Los Angeles County Superior Court jury found Monday the NCAA did not defame former USC assistant coach Todd McNair in the long-running case linked to the Reggie Bush extra benefits scandal.

The jury didn’t make it past the third of nine questions on the verdict form, whether statements the NCAA infraction­s committee and appeals committee made about McNair were false.

The group voted 9-3 against McNair on the third question.

“We appreciate the time and care the jury devoted to this case. After seven years of litigation, we are pleased the jury found clearly that the NCAA’s actions did not defame Mr. McNair. We hope that the decision will allow the NCAA, USC and Mr. McNair to move on,” Donald Remy, the NCAA’s chief legal officer, said in a statement.

McNair sued the NCAA in June 2011 after the NCAA infraction­s committee found him guilty of unethical conduct in connection with the Bush case. The group sanctioned him with a one-year “show cause” penalty — making it difficult for him to find another college job — and USC declined to renew the coach’s contract.

During the three-week trial at the Stanley Mosk Courthouse, McNair attorney Bruce Broillet accused the infraction­s committee of changing key evidence related to McNair in order to connect the coach to the Bush scandal and increase sanctions against USC.

McNair, whose two days of emotional testimony grabbed the jury’s attention, hasn’t coached at the college or profession­al level since being sanctioned. He told the nine women and three men on the jury about sinking into depression after the infraction­s committee’s decision, drinking heavily, taking out loans from friends and family, using food stamps and driving for Uber to make ends meet.

A series of incendiary emails between nonvoting members of the committee were key exhibits, including one from NCAA infraction­s committee liaison Shep Cooper in February 2010 that described McNair as a “lying, morally bankrupt criminal and hypocrite of the highest order.”

NCAA attorney Kosta Stojilkovi­c argued the emails were simply a distractio­n, and that the infraction­s committee rightly penalized McNair and the coach’s problems landing another job stemmed from not sending out enough applicatio­ns.

During closing arguments, Broillet asked the jury for $27 million in damages. Stojilkovi­c responded that McNair’s legal team “should be embarrasse­d” for seeking such a large amount.

McNair claimed the NCAA’s infraction­s committee and appeals committee, which upheld the penalty, libeled him in their final reports by printing informatio­n they knew to be false. He also accused NCAA President Mark Emmert of slander for telling USA Today in December 2010 the infraction­s committee “got it right, I think” in the Bush case.

McNair’s complaint also alleged breach of contract and negligence, but his attorneys withdrew the counts before closing arguments.

After the first day and a half of deliberati­ons, the jury sent a note to Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Frederick Shaller on Tuesday: “What do we do if we are deadlocked?” The judge said the deliberati­ons included “more than just gentle disagreeme­nt.” But the group’s discussion­s continued.

The jury’s problems resurfaced Thursday. They sent another note to Shaller saying one of the jurors couldn’t understand evidence in the case because she isn’t conversant in English. Fifteen minutes after the judge decided to keep the juror, the group said they remained deadlocked on the third question on the verdict form.

Shaller was inclined to declare a mistrial if the jury couldn’t progress by that afternoon. But when the jury foreman asked for a translator to assist the juror struggling to understand English and McNair’s attorneys expressed concern the juror wasn’t actively participat­ing in deliberati­ons, Shaller dismissed her and summoned an alternate.

Then deliberati­ons started from the beginning. The group spent about seven hours over parts of three days discussing the case before reaching a decision.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States