Smart Homes can and will be used against you

Law enforcement agencies are already using stored information as evidence in criminal cases

Smart Homes are dumb. There, I said it. I’m sure those involved in the almost half-billiondollar-a-year connected home technology business in the United States won’t be happy with my statement, but I’m sticking to my guns. So-called smart technology is not your friend.

I know, I know. There are those who can’t imagine life without their voiceactivated gizmo that turns on lights, the heating and cooling system or their home entertainment center. Others brag about their “smart” refrigerator that scans items and lets them know when to buy more. There is even a “smart” mattress that “tracks over 15 factors about your sleep and health, including deep sleep, heart rate and respiratory rate,” according to its website.

But guess what? All the information put into these technologies by you can then be extracted by law enforcement and used against you. This is not a maybe proposition; it’s already happening.

If you are one of the approximately 39 million Americans who walk in the door and give your speaker gadget a command like, “Turn on my lights and my music,” you should know the technology tapes your voice command and uploads it to a remote server while it deciphers what you want. If there is background conversation it tapes that and stores it as well.

Also potentially working against you are the “smart” utility meters many companies are now installing in or just outside residences across the country. These devices monitor a home’s water, electricity and gas consumption right down to the day and hour.

With all this in mind consider what happened to James Bates of Bentonville, Ark. After a night of heavy drinking and TV football, Bates phoned 911 to report he’d found his friend, Victor Collins, floating face down in his outdoor hot tub, dead. When police arrived, they realized Bates’ house and yard were outfitted with smart technologies that likely could bear witness to what had happened. They began to investigate all the clues they could find – both physical and technological.

When police learned Bates’ utility meter had measured water consumption between 1 and 3 a.m. far in excess of what he’d ever used before, detectives deduced there had been a bloody struggle and Bates had used the outdoor hose to wash away the evidence. He was arrested for murder and faced up to 40 years in prison.

The Bentonville police also subpoenaed Amazon for the voice command files from Bates’ Alexa device to see if any conversations were captured from the night in question. Amazon stonewalled police, not wanting to upset a customer or set a time-consuming precedent, and finally an exasperated Bates voluntarily waived his right to keep the information private. Clever move because his Alexa recordings offered no suspicious information. The murder charge against Bates was ultimately dropped — after two years.

The point here, of course, is that your smart appliances could turn out to be an irrefutable witness against you.

Imagine the suspect who insists he was home in bed at the time of the crime. His smart mattress could prove he was lying. Or it could reveal he was home in bed shortly after the murder/hit and run/ burglary tossing and turning with a muchelevated heart rate. Suspicious!

Imagine the person who tells police she was home eating a bowl of cereal when the crime occurred. But information from her smart refrigerator could turn her into a suspect if it showed she had been warned days earlier that she was out of milk.

I don’t want to live in a world where my appliances spy on me. You won’t ever catch me buying any of these highfalutin’ gadgets. I’m not swayed by the latest stats showing one in six Americans now have a smart speaker to which they can shout out commands. I already have a car that, literally, conducts surveillance on me every time I get behind the wheel, alerting me with “lane departure!” warnings if I stray an inch. There are already too many public cameras capturing my activity. Too many facial recognition devises at airports and other public places I go.

Nope, I don’t need to pay good money and invite into my home even more intrusions. And I will never understand those who don’t realize what they’re giving up when they join the Orwellian technological march toward self-imposed surveillance.

Voice-activated appliances aren’t a lifestyle advancement like, say, the television remote that simply made life easier. Today’s costly play toys have embedded microphones that work both ways to capture your conversations and store them. And devices that measure your bodily functions, utility consumption or food intake can — and are — being used against you by technologically minded police officers. But what if those officers misinterpret the clues borne of this trendy new crime fighting tool?

I say turn on your own lights and spare yourself the potential for invasion of privacy.