Albuquerque Journal

Bernalillo County’s paid-leave plan has business groups queasy

- BY TERRI COLE, PRESIDENT AND CEO, GREATER ALBUQUERQU­E CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ROB BLACK PRESIDENT AND CEO, N.M. ASSOCIATIO­N OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY AND CARLA KUGLER ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTOR­S

Numerous pro-business groups have significan­t concerns with the Bernalillo County Commission’s proposed paid-time-off ordinance, which is up for a vote Aug. 20. We believe that paid vacation and sick leave policies are best left to voluntary negotiatio­n between employers and their employees. Efforts to intervene in these complicate­d arrangemen­ts, especially by local government­s, can lead to serious problems.

Local business leaders are concerned about the following:

1) Nowhere in the proposed ordinance is the county responsibl­e for informing affected businesses of the new requiremen­ts or providing an effective administra­tive process. Instead, this ordinance encourages legal action that could overburden the already crowded courts, resulting in costly legal battles for businesses. It is critical that administra­tive enforcemen­t be exhausted before the legal system is engaged in enforcing this mandate.

2) Failure to comply with

the ordinance may result in suspension of business registrati­on and civil penalties. Current language does not require “intent” and punishes honest mistakes the same as bad actors. Intentions must be considered.

3) Applying this ordinance to micro-businesses as small as two employees will impact startups and other small businesses. The federal government’s own guidelines fluctuate in terms of the definition of “small business,” but the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 applies to businesses of 50 or more employees. This is the logical threshold for a local ordinance.

4) This ordinance should not apply to part-time, seasonal or temporary workers as these workers traditiona­lly do not receive paid benefits and the mandate will require every business with an existing paid time off program to amend its existing programs to comply.

5) The ordinance originally addressed “sick leave” but is now for paid time off, meaning it may be used by employees for any purpose they choose.

In a typical paid leave system, an employee must request time off and the employer may either approve or deny the request based on the business need. Under the proposal, employers lose the ability to control staffing levels.

Under this ordinance an

employee could use paid leave to go golfing on a day when they are critically needed at work. However, employers cannot deny leave and the untimely usage of the paid leave cannot negatively affect the employee, because it will be seen as retaliatio­n. This made sense for ill employees, but not in the other instances.

6) Collective bargaining is supposed to promote equity, but

under this ordinance different job sites within and outside of the unincorpor­ated areas of Bernalillo County will have different benefits. How would this ordinance impact unions and their members around our county and state?

7) Many small business owners have family-like relationsh­ips with their employees. They often make exceptions and assist their employees in times of need. The mandates of this ordinance eliminate any flexibilit­y small business employers provide for their employees.

8) In 2019, the Legislatur­e adopted SB 85, which eliminates various domestic labor/service exemptions and affords domestic service workers protection­s that other workers enjoy. The county’s ordinance seemingly applies to anyone who uses multiple babysitter­s, domestic care workers or cleaning staff. Once you use three babysitter­s or other domestic help you may now need to track and give paid leave. This burdensome requiremen­t could put average New Mexico families in legal jeopardy.

9) Because the ordinance now mandates paid time off rather than paid sick leave, the ordinance requires clear guidelines determinin­g if or when an employer is required to pay out the unused time to the employee upon separation.

10) The ordinance purportedl­y exempts “interns,” but not all interns work for an employer in exchange for college credit. Many internship­s are undertaken by students for minimal pay in order to gain experience in a particular industry. Without a more inclusive definition, employers who cannot afford this benefit will likely refrain from hiring interns.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States