Albuquerque Journal

Ariz. for-profit looks to shelter undocument­ed kids in ABQ

Company has faced allegation­s that it mistreated minors

- BY JESSICA DYER JOURNAL STAFF WRITER

A for-profit Arizona company dogged by allegation­s it has in the past mistreated young people in its care is looking to open an Albuquerqu­e facility to house undocument­ed children who entered the country without their parents.

An email recently sent to some Albuquerqu­e residents describes VisionQues­t’s plan to house up to 60 undocument­ed minors at an existing building on Central Avenue and Ash. Boys between the ages of 11 and 17 who crossed the U.S. border without a guardian would stay at the facility between 30 and 90 days “while they are transition­ing to a more permanent home,” according to the letter obtained by the Journal.

“VisionQues­t will provide educationa­l services, health care services including vision and dental, community engagement, and recreation for the participat­ing children,” says the letter signed by Michael Vos of the Albuquerqu­e consulting firm Consensus Planning.

The letter says the company is working under an award from the federal government’s Office of Refugee Resettleme­nt, part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Administra­tion for Children and Families.

VisionQues­t in July received a $2.9 million award for “residentia­l shelter care services for unaccompan­ied minors in New Mexico,” according to the HHS website. It’s one of several VisionQues­t awards for sheltering or running foster care programs for undocument­ed children, according to the website.

A VisionQues­t spokeswoma­n said the company aims to open the Albuquerqu­e site — which it’s calling the Sam Mahan Center — by January.

The children remain in federal custody while in VisionQues­t’s care, though both the company and HHS say it is not a “detention” facility.

“VisionQues­t was not contracted to operate a detention center, and hence is not detaining children,” company spokeswoma­n Amanda Burton said in an email to the Journal, adding that the company was contracted to offer temporary shelter, medical treatment and education.

The HHS communicat­ions office did not answer specific questions about VisionQues­t’s funding or obligation­s under the grant.

But the agency said in an unsigned email that the Office of Refugee Resettleme­nt “in general operates a network of state licensed residentia­l centers, NOT detention centers.”

HHS currently has responsibi­lity for 7,600 unaccompan­ied, undocument­ed children who were apprehende­d by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The refugee office operates a network of approximat­ely 170 facilities and programs around the country, the email said.

A spokesman for the New Mexico Children, Youth and Families Department said VisionQues­t has submitted applicatio­n documents that are currently under review.

The company does not have any CYFD-licensed facilities in New Mexico presently, CYFD spokesman Charlie Moore-Pabst said.

The state agency has not before licensed any group home specifical­ly for undocument­ed, unaccompan­ied children, he said. However, the state welcomes the opportunit­y to be involved.

“We’re looking at it as a good thing that they’re requiring the (state) licensing” for these facilities, he said of the federal government.

The prospect of VisionQues­t establishi­ng a local shelter for undocument­ed children is already causing some alarm.

Felipe Rodriguez of the New Mexico Dream Team, which advocates for immigrant rights, said VisionQues­t’s history is concerning and that his and other organizati­ons are beginning to coalesce in opposition.

“There’s many allegation­s of mistreatme­nt, neglect and abuse at their facilities,” Rodriguez said.

A plan to open a shelter for undocument­ed, unaccompan­ied boys in Philadelph­ia has met fierce opposition, prompted a legal battle with the city over zoning and generated multiple media investigat­ions into VisionQues­t’s past operations.

The company previously ran a juvenile-justice center in Philadelph­ia, but shut it down in 2017 when the city — which was contractin­g the company for services — halted intake to the facility.

According to the Philadelph­ia Inquirer, state records show that VisionQues­t had fired at least three employees for hitting or physically handling children in the facility between 2011 and 2017 and that inspectors had noted various other problems, including staff who lacked first aid certificat­ion and issues like mouse droppings in cafeteria heaters.

VisionQues­t’s CEO Peter Ranalli told the newspaper last year that juvenileju­stice centers often face abuse complaints and not all those about VisionQues­t were accurate.

“Did we have staff do inappropri­ate things?” the Inquirer quoted Ranalli as saying in 2018. “When you have 130 staff, somebody is going to do something inappropri­ate.”

The public media organizati­on, WHYY, reported that multiple VisionQues­t employees speaking anonymousl­y described “a hostile work culture rife with verbal discord and threats of violence between staff, and a lack of job-specific training.”

Asked about past accusation­s of negligence and abuse at its facilities, VisionQues­t’s Burton said the company has served over 100,000 youth since its 1973 founding.

“VisionQues­t currently has 11 successful­ly operating residentia­l child care licenses and responds immediatel­y to any issues brought forth from youth staff and stakeholde­rs,” she wrote.

In addition to a state license, VisionQues­t would need approval from the city of Albuquerqu­e to use the Central Avenue property as a large “group home” since that would be a conditiona­l use under current zoning.

The building, located about two blocks west of the University of New Mexico, appears currently vacant.

Brennon Williams, interim director of the city’s Planning Department, said last week that VisionQues­t had not yet filed such an applicatio­n. Obtaining approval for the group home would require a public hearing before the city’s Zoning Hearing Examiner, he said. The examiner makes the determinat­ion, though his or her decision can be appealed to City Council, Williams said, which would mean a review by the city’s Land Use Hearing Officer and potentiall­y a hearing before City Council.

Mayor Tim Keller’s office said it “opposes family separation policies and detention centers for children.”

“If the proposed facility is for those purposes, it is not within the spirit of inclusion that we champion here in Albuquerqu­e,” Keller spokeswoma­n Jessie Damazyn said in a written statement. “The Planning Department will carefully review the details of any applicatio­n that is submitted.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States