Albuquerque Journal

Obama-era water protection rule voided

Administra­tion says regulation hindered developmen­t

- BY JOHN FLESHER

TRAVERSE CITY, Mich. — The Trump administra­tion on Thursday revoked an Obama-era regulation that shielded many U.S. wetlands and streams from pollution but was opposed by developers and farmers who said it hurt economic developmen­t and infringed on property rights.

Environmen­tal groups criticized the administra­tion’s action, the latest in a series of moves to roll back environmen­tal protection­s put into place under President Barack Obama.

The 2015 Waters of the United States rule defined the waterways subject to federal regulation. Scrapping it “puts an end to an egregious power grab, eliminates an ongoing patchwork of clean water regulation­s and restores a long-standing and familiar regulatory framework,” Environmen­tal Protection Agency Administra­tor Andrew Wheeler told a news conference in Washington, D.C.

Wheeler and R.D. James, assistant secretary of the Army for civil works, signed a document overturnin­g the rule and temporaril­y restoring an earlier regulatory system that emerged after a 2006 ruling from a sharply divided Supreme Court.

The agencies plan to adopt a new rule by the end of the year that is expected to define protected waterways more narrowly than the Obama policy.

The Clean Water Act requires landowners to obtain federal permits before developing or polluting navigable waterways such as rivers and lakes. But disputes have long persisted over what other waters are subject to regulation — particular­ly wetlands that don’t have a direct connection to those larger waters, along with small headwater streams and channels that flow only during and after rainfall.

Environmen­talists contend that many of those smaller, seemingly isolated waters are tributarie­s of the larger waterways and can have a significan­t effect on their quality. Denying them federal protection would leave millions of Americans with less safe drinking water and allow damage of wetlands that prevent flooding, filter pollutants and provide habitat for fish, waterfowl and other wildlife, they said.

“By repealing the Clean Water Rule, this administra­tion is opening our iconic waterways to a flood of pollution,” said Bart Johnsen-Harris of Environmen­t America. “The EPA is abdicating its mission to protect our environmen­t and our health.”

Wheeler said regulators had gone far beyond the intent of Congress under the 1972 clean water law.

The question of which waters are covered under the Clean Water Act has inspired decades of lawsuits and numerous bills in Congress.

 ?? PATRICK SEMANSKY/ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Environmen­tal Protection Agency Administra­tor Andrew Wheeler, right, signs a document in front of R.D. James, assistant secretary of the Army for civil works, to revoke the Clean Water Rule.
PATRICK SEMANSKY/ASSOCIATED PRESS Environmen­tal Protection Agency Administra­tor Andrew Wheeler, right, signs a document in front of R.D. James, assistant secretary of the Army for civil works, to revoke the Clean Water Rule.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States