Albuquerque Journal

NBA salutes its Chinese overlords, sells out Hong Kong

- RICH LOWRY Columnist

Little did Dr. James Naismith know when he invented the game of basketball in Springfiel­d, Massachuse­tts, in 1891 that, more than a century hence, it would become beholden to its Chinese overlords. The NBA disgraced itself kowtowing to Beijing after the general manager of the Houston Rockets, Daryl Morey, tweeted his support for Hong Kong protesters. The words he associated himself with — “Fight for Freedom. Stand with Hong Kong” — would seem uncontrove­rsial. Who doesn’t hope for the best for plucky demonstrat­ors trying to advance democracy against an overweenin­g imperial dictatorsh­ip?

Morey, though, failed to adequately account for the feelings of the dictatorsh­ip. “I was merely voicing one thought,” he said, in a groveling tweet after deleting his original offending one, “based on one interpreta­tion, of one complicate­d event. I have had a lot of opportunit­y since that tweet to hear and consider other perspectiv­es.” The “other perspectiv­es” are those of people supporting a regime that is determined to crush Hong Kong underfoot, maintain a one-party state that stifles all internal dissent, brutally repress Uighur Muslims, grab the South China Sea, build up its military with an eye to a future confrontat­ion with United States and rewrite the rules of the internatio­nal order to its liking. But who’s to judge?

In its own lickspittl­e statement, the NBA said that Morey’s views “have deeply offended many of our friends and fans in China, which is regrettabl­e.” It appears that the Chinese-language version was even more extravagan­tly craven, saying the league is “extremely disappoint­ed” in the GM’s “inappropri­ate” tweet that “severely hurt the feelings of Chinese fans.” (A follow-up statement from NBA Commission­er Adam Silver added the league “will not put itself in a position of regulating what players, employees and team owners say or will not say on these issues.”)

If you follow the NBA and missed the part where Red China stole the league’s soul, it’s only because you haven’t paid enough attention to the internatio­nal business. China is a huge and growing market for the NBA. When Chinese sponsors and partners of the Rockets began to pull out, the team and the league buckled. It’s a matter of filthy lucre, pure and simple.

In retrospect, all the old Soviet Union would have needed to distort corporate America for its purposes was a large and lucrative market. Too committed to communism, Moscow never managed to create one. Via its hybrid system of semicapita­lism wedded to a repressive one-party state, Beijing did. The resulting riches and potential customers allow it to yank the chain of an array of American businesses, including the NBA. The joke of it is that here at home the league flaunts its woke social conscience. The NBA used the leverage of its All-Star Game coming to Charlotte to force changes to a North Carolina bathroom bill, in the name of “equality.”One would think that reeducatio­n camps for a million Uighurs — to pick just one of China’s human rights abuses — is much worse than any choice North Carolina makes about its restrooms. Even if all that the NBA cares about is LGBTQ issues, it should be repelled by China’s policies, which run counter to everything that the NBA purports to stand for.

This episode exposes the league’s gutless hypocrisy. So long as social activism is costless — or enhances its reputation among the right people in the United States — the NBA is all about its values. As soon as there is any price, it is willing to salute smartly at the dictates of one of the most cynical, self-interested regimes on Earth.

Of course, any profit-generating enterprise is going to care about its bottom line most of all. That shouldn’t efface all sense of decency and self-respect, though.

James Harden, the Houston Rockets star, has grown very rich and famous playing an American game in an American league. His reaction to Morey’s tweet was unequivoca­l: “We apologize.” He thus neatly encapsulat­ed the willingnes­s of a segment of the American business elite to express a kind of national loyalty to a nation that isn’t its own.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States