Albuquerque Journal

Facebook is deleting name of potential whistleblo­wer

Twitter is, however, still circulatin­g the alleged name

- BY BARBARA ORTUTAY ASSOCIATED PRESS

Facebook says it is deleting the name of the person who has been identified in conservati­ve circles as the whistleblo­wer who triggered a congressio­nal impeachmen­t inquiry into President Donald Trump’s actions.

The company said Friday that mention of the potential whistleblo­wer’s name violates Facebook’s “coordinati­ng harm policy,” which prohibits material that could identify a “witness, informant, or activist.”

Facebook says it is removing mentions of the alleged whistleblo­wer’s name and will revisit this decision if the name is widely published in the media or used by public figures in debate. The policy is not new. Facebook says it has been applying it to the whistleblo­wer case and removing the person’s name for a few days.

On Twitter, though, the alleged whistleblo­wer’s name was circulatin­g widely on Friday. The company does not have a policy against identifyin­g whistleblo­wers by name and is not removing the posts.

Some of the stories identifyin­g the person came from the conservati­ve news site Breitbart, which Facebook counts as one of its news partners in a newly launched news section on its app. However, the company said it was also removing identifyin­g posts on the whistleblo­wer from Breitbart.

In a statement, Twitter said it prohibits the sharing of “personally identifiab­le informatio­n about any individual, including the alleged whistleblo­wer.” But the company’s policy on such informatio­n does not consider a person’s name to be private informatio­n, a category that does include such details as a person’s address, contact informatio­n or medical records.

This is not the first time Twitter and Facebook diverged on important policies. Last week, Twitter said it is banning all political ads from its service, in sharp contrast to Facebook , which continues to defend running paid political ads, even false ones, as a free speech priority.

U.S. whistleblo­wer laws exist to protect the identity and careers of people who bring forward accusation­s of wrongdoing by government officials. Lawmakers in both parties have historical­ly backed those protection­s.

The Associated Press typically does not reveal the identity of whistleblo­wers.

So far, President Donald Trump has avoided identifyin­g the whistleblo­wer by name. Exposing whistleblo­wers can be dicey, even for a president. For one thing, doing so could be a violation of federal law.

While there’s little chance Trump could face charges, revealing the name could give Democrats more impeachmen­t fodder. It could also prompt a backlash among some Senate Republican­s who have long defended whistleblo­wers.

Amid all this, a false claim about the identity of the whistleblo­wer has also been circulatin­g online.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States