Albuquerque Journal

Bit by bit, Trump disables those who obstruct his power

- Email ruthmarcus@washpost.com. 2020, Washington Post Writers Group.

WASHINGTON — First President Trump came for Congress. He intimidate­d Republican lawmakers, making them so fearful of inciting his wrath — and the wrath of his followers — that they became the subjugated branch, not the coequal one.

When Democrats managed to regain control of the House of Representa­tives in 2018, Trump dealt with the problem of an institutio­n newly empowered to take him on — indeed, to impeach him — by treating it with unpreceden­ted disdain. He ignored their requests for documents and testimony, then their subpoenas, then dispatched his lawyers to argue that they could not go to court to obtain the material.

So much for checks and balances.

Then Trump went after the executive branch, rooting out the deep state he is convinced is trying to undermine him.

He undermined the independen­ce of the intelligen­ce community that he blamed for what he calls the Russia “hoax.” He disparaged its work and questioned its conclusion­s when they diverged from his preferred outcomes. As Senate Intelligen­ce Committee vice chairman Mark Warner, D-Va., wrote last month, he pushed out officials, including two directors of national intelligen­ce and the acting director of the National Counterter­rorism Center, “because they had the temerity to brief the president and Congress about threats to the United States that are politicall­y inconvenie­nt to Trump.”

In their stead, he installed or sought to install political hacks, naming as acting director of national intelligen­ce Richard Grenell, the U.S. ambassador to Germany who has scant intelligen­ce experience but a seemingly bottomless willingnes­s to defend the president on television and social media, and nominating Texas congressma­n John Ratcilffe, who before Grenell’s selection was widely described as the least qualified person ever tapped for the position.

And in the brutal aftermath of impeachmen­t, an emboldened Trump, acquitted by the Senate, got his revenge on those who had the temerity to testify against him, firing U.S. ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland and having Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman marched out of the White House, where he had been detailed to the National Security Council, by armed guards, along with his twin brother, for good measure.

In recent weeks, pandemic notwithsta­nding, Trump has turned his attention to inspectors general — the supposedly independen­t watchdogs entrusted with preventing fraud, waste, abuse and mismanagem­ent at government agencies. He began, predictabl­y enough, with Michael Atkinson, the intelligen­ce community inspector general. Atkinson had the integrity — disloyalty, as Trump saw it — to report to Congress, as the law required, the whistleblo­wer complaint about Trump and Ukraine that triggered the impeachmen­t inquiry.

But that was just the start of Trump’s rampage against inspectors general. When Glenn Fine, acting inspector general at the Defense Department, was named to an additional role overseeing the spending of coronaviru­s relief funds, Trump ousted Fine from the Defense job, ensuring he could not serve in the pandemic role. He engaged in a similar maneuver with Christi Grimm, acting inspector general for the Department of Health and Human Services, after her office criticized the administra­tion’s response to the pandemic.

Then, on May 15, Trump fired State Department inspector general Steve A. Linick, who had been investigat­ing potential misuse of staff by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Presidents have the power to remove inspectors general, but this was a rare event in the pre-Trump era, with presidents wary of the political blowback from taking such a step. When President Barack Obama in 2009 fired Gerald Walpin, inspector general of the Corporatio­n for National and Community Service, the removal of an obscure inspector general from a small agency became a Republican cause célèbre.

Utah’s Mitt Romney, the only Senate Republican with a semblance of backbone, offered a succinct explanatio­n of the danger of Trump’s actions: “The firings of multiple Inspectors General is unpreceden­ted; doing so without good cause chills the independen­ce essential to their purpose,” Romney wrote on Twitter. “It is a threat to accountabl­e democracy and a fissure in the constituti­onal balance of power.”

This is, in a nutshell, what we have been witnessing from the very start of the Trump administra­tion: a concerted and disturbing­ly successful effort to dismantle the multiple mechanisms of accountabl­e democracy, and to tilt the constituti­onal balance in favor of the executive.

There is an exhaustion factor when it comes to chroniclin­g Trump and his litany of abuses, but it is essential to go through this list to grasp the full scope of what he has been doing: bit by bit, disabling the institutio­ns and individual­s that could present an obstacle or cause him harm.

Congressio­nal Republican­s are cowed. The executive branch is purged and brought to heel. The courts — with the assiduous assistance of Senate Republican­s — are stocked to the extent possible with Trump appointees. And Trump remains, ever less constraine­d, ever more empowered.

 ??  ?? RUTH MARCUS
RUTH MARCUS

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States