Albuquerque Journal

Biden: Delay on $1.9T aid plan boosting costs

President says plan is a bargain compared to possible economic damage

- BY JOSH BOAK, LISA MASCARO AND ZEKE MILLER

WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden warned Friday of a steep and growing “cost of inaction” on his $1.9 trillion COVID relief plan as the White House searched for “creative” ways to win public support for a package getting a cold shoulder from Senate Republican­s.

In the age of COVID, it’s not as simple as traveling the country to try and gin up a groundswel­l. And at a time of deep polarizati­on, Biden may struggle to convince Republican voters of the urgency when Congress already has approved $4 trillion in aid, including $900 billion last month.

Biden signaled Friday for the first time that he’s willing to move ahead without Republican­s. “I support passing COVID relief with support from Republican­s if we can get it,” he told reporters. “But the COVID relief has to pass.

No ifs, ands or buts.”

His message so far has been that a fresh $1.9 trillion in aid would be a bargain compared to the potential damage to the world’s largest economy if it doesn’t pass. An aggressive push for vaccinatio­ns and generous aid to individual­s would help put parents back to work, and let children return to school and improve their lifetime earnings, Biden said at a Friday meeting with Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen in the Oval Office.

“We have learned from past crises that the risk is not doing too much,” he said. “The risk is not doing enough.”

Only a week into his presidency, Biden is confrontin­g the challenge of selling his first major piece of legislatio­n to a country he has pledged to unite. Private calls with Republican lawmakers have yet to produce any progress on reaching a deal, while Senate Democrats are now preparing to pass the measure strictly on partisan lines as soon as next week.

Some Biden allies have expressed frustratio­n that the administra­tion has not more clearly defined what the massive legislatio­n would actually accomplish. The new president instead has largely focused his first nine days in office on signing executive orders rolling back his predecesso­r’s policies.

In particular, Biden, for whom the widespread distributi­on of coronaviru­s vaccines will be a defining test, has not explained what the increased money for testing and vaccinatio­n would achieve — including how much quicker the White House believes it would help bring about an end to the pandemic.

Biden’s outreach to senators has largely brought criticism that the plan should be more targeted and that the country can afford to wait to see the effects of the stimulus dollars that were approved in December.

Republican lawmakers see a need for speeding vaccinatio­ns, but one Senate aide said their offices are not being bombarded with calls for an additional aid package. Constituen­ts are more focused on the looming impeachmen­t trial, said the aide.

This has left the Biden team trying to expand its outreach beyond Capitol Hill.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Biden recognizes the importance of speaking directly to the American people about his plan for vaccinatio­ns and supporting the economy, but the pandemic has limited his ability to safely travel to drum up support. The administra­tion is relying on TV interviews by White House officials and allies with local media and such national shows as “The View,” as well as calls with governors, local officials and progressiv­e and civic groups.

“We’re taking a number of creative steps, a little outside of the box,” Psaki said. “Certainly, his preference would be to get on a plane and fly around the country.”

 ?? EVAN VUCCI/ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? President Joe Biden meets with Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen in the Oval Office on Jan. 29, when Biden noted that “the risk is not doing too much; the risk is not doing enough.”
EVAN VUCCI/ASSOCIATED PRESS President Joe Biden meets with Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen in the Oval Office on Jan. 29, when Biden noted that “the risk is not doing too much; the risk is not doing enough.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States