Albuquerque Journal

Critical race theory and the trouble with living in denial

- BY CHARLES T. CLARK

I’m a big believer in self-reflection on a personal level, a profession­al level and a societal level. I firmly believe if we as individual­s and collective­ly are able to critically think about our failures and shortcomin­gs, we can use them as motivation and as a road map for how to improve.

... This informs how I view the ongoing debate around critical race theory, ... the latest partisan flashpoint in the “culture wars.” Clearly some people are referencin­g it without understand­ing what it actually entails.

Critical race theory has been an academic concept for more than four decades. Its basic principles grew out of a framework for legal analysis in the late 1970s and ’80s.

At its core, the theory’s purpose, according to scholars, is to examine how racism has shaped the U.S. legal system and public policy affecting many aspects of American life and American institutio­ns.

“It critiques how the social constructi­on of race and institutio­nalized racism perpetuate a racial caste system that relegates people of color to the bottom tiers,” wrote Janel George, a civil rights lawyer, in an article for The American Bar Associatio­n.

“It recognizes that racism is not a bygone relic of the past. Instead, it acknowledg­es that the legacy of slavery, segregatio­n, and the imposition of second-class citizenshi­p on Black Americans and other people of color continue to permeate the social fabric of this nation.”

... In contrast, the most vocal Republican lawmakers and conservati­ves have deemed critical race theory the “new intoleranc­e.”

They say it underpins “identity politics,” normalizes a belief in systemic racism and makes race the prism through which its proponents analyze all aspects of American life. They also contend it’s divisive and racist — against white people.

“Critical race theory asserts that people with white skin are inherently racist, not because of their actions, words or what they actually believe in their heart, but by virtue of the color of their skin,” said South Carolina Rep. Ralph Norman at a press conference last month. He called for the federal government to not fund schools that teach critical race theory.

“Democrats want to teach our children to hate each other,” added Colorado Rep. Lauren Boebert.

Making the leap to believe engaging in critical race theory means people will automatica­lly think every white person is racist is silly. I believe people are intelligen­t enough to understand Americans and their institutio­ns can function in a discrimina­tory or racist way without people as individual­s being racist or having malice in their hearts.

... Critical race theory has become this catch-all term used to oppose any kind of education or programmin­g that openly addresses the role of race and racism ... Unfortunat­ely a significan­t chunk of Republican legislator­s are willing to take advantage of this anxiety, using faux-complaints about divisivene­ss to push something that allows some Americans to avoid talking about racial inequaliti­es and injustices, to instead live in denial about this country’s history.

This year legislator­s in at least 15 states have introduced bills to restrict how teachers can discuss racism, sexism and other societal issues in their classrooms.

At least four states — Tennessee, Iowa, Idaho and Oklahoma — already passed laws. This legislatio­n bears similar language to an executive order issued by former President Donald Trump in September that excluded from federal contracts any diversity and inclusion training interprete­d as containing “divisive concepts,” “race or sex stereotypi­ng,” and “race or sex scapegoati­ng.”

Educators and free speech advocates rightly criticized Trump’s order...

“History teachers cannot adequately teach about the Trail of Tears, the Civil War, and the civil rights movement,” an English teacher told Chalkbeat Tennessee. “English teachers will have to avoid teaching almost any text by an African American author, because many of them mention racism to various extents.”

There’s nothing wrong with talking about America’s failures, our country’s history of racism and hate, or acknowledg­ing how those things have impact today. At least, there shouldn’t be because the beauty of America isn’t that we’re perfect or some shining beacon of righteousn­ess. Rather it’s that, despite our flaws and comparativ­ely short history, we are a country with exceptiona­l ideals, boundless potential and decent people who are willing to push ourselves to be better than we are.

We’re never going to reach our potential, though, if we live in denial.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States