Albuquerque Journal

Hostage negotiator­s in Qatar build momentum behind ‘more for more’

- DAVID IGNATIUS

The Israeli-Hamas hostage-release negotiatio­ns continue to roll forward, as American and Israeli spy chiefs met Tuesday with a Qatari mediator and discussed a plan for eventual release of all Israelis held captive in Gaza, including soldiers.

The “more for more” logic that has guided the hostage talks so far remains strong for both Israel and Hamas, according to a source close to the negotiatio­ns. He explained that although no final commitment­s have been made, “there is a willingnes­s on both sides” to make a broad deal that would free all Israeli captives in exchange for longer pauses in fighting, release of more Palestinia­n prisoners and more humanitari­an assistance for Palestinia­ns in Gaza.

Tuesday’s meeting brought together CIA Director William J. Burns, Mossad Director David Barnea and Qatari Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahma­n al-Thani, who has acted as intermedia­ry with Hamas leaders based in Doha.

The structure of Tuesday’s talks was the same as the Nov. 9 meeting in Doha that produced the breakthrou­gh that led to the hostage releases that began over the weekend . As before, the Qataris asked Hamas to explain its parameters for release and then shared those with the Mossad representa­tive, who detailed Israel’s requiremen­ts.

The negotiator­s agreed on five categories of Israeli hostages for future releases, the knowledgea­ble source said. The five groups are: men too old for reserve military duty, female soldiers, male reservists, active-duty male soldiers, and the bodies of Israelis who died before or during captivity. The total is well over 100, but the source said he couldn’t provide a precise number as yet.

Hamas has expressed “willingnes­s to negotiate on all five categories,” the source said. He added that parameters of the exchange — such as how many Gaza captives would be freed each day, how many Palestinia­n prisoners would be exchanged for each Israeli, and how much humanitari­an assistance would be sent into Gaza — haven’t been worked out.

The remaining hostages are spread among different groups, in addition to Hamas. Some are held by Palestinia­n Islamic Jihad, which, like Hamas, is an Iran-backed faction. But some are held by small militant groups that are little more than gangster families. Hamas has told the Qataris that they are “confident they can get everyone,” the source said, even though they are scattered.

One grim problem is that while Hamas and Islamic Jihad held their hostages in tunnels, where they were relatively safe from bombing and bombardmen­t, the smaller groups might have had their captives abovegroun­d, where they were in greater danger. Hamas “is not sure who’s alive and who’s not,” the source said.

If the hostage releases can continue — and extend to the military captives that Hamas prizes most — the negotiator­s will then inescapabl­y have to confront the issue of whether fighting would resume after captives are freed.

This endgame will be the trickiest issue of all. Israel continues to say it will resume fighting until it has destroyed Hamas’s ability to rule Gaza. Hamas, for its part, wants to survive, physically and politicall­y. It’s hard to see the space for compromise on these questions, which both sides see as existentia­l.

But the hostage release process has defied expectatio­ns so far, and that may continue. The key has been the step-by-step confidence building adopted by the Qatari mediators. At first, none of the negotiator­s was sure that Hamas would keep its word or even that the political leaders could negotiate with the military wing hidden in tunnels.

But those big hurdles were overcome. The many small details that negotiator­s feared would derail the talks were resolved, too.

For the Biden administra­tion, which has been struggling to contain the political fallout of the Gaza war in the United States and abroad, the hostage-release process has been the one unalloyed success. Officials will be pleased that it seems to be continuing — but the vexing question of how this war ends becomes more important every day.

 ?? ??
 ?? Syndicated Columnist ??
Syndicated Columnist

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States