Playground would alter park’s uniqueness

Your (Sunday Journal, April 7) editorial about Netherwood Park was focused on the use of political influence to pursue a personal agenda.

That approach missed the point of this particular debate. Netherwood Park is a unique park. It is used by many people from all over the city because of its open vistas and natural design.

All parks are open to the public and Netherwood has people playing games, just relaxing enjoying the peaceful atmosphere. Like Huning Castle and the Alvarado Hotel, Netherwood represents a particular place in Albuquerque’s architectural history.

Just installing the most popular play equipment destroys that specialness and makes Netherwood just another park.

The issue is whether conservation is to be respected in regards to Netherwood Park?

The argument that what children want trumps all other concerns is quite flawed. Young children have access to playground equipment at school, in backyards and in many parks.

When enjoying Netherwood kids can make up games, roll down hills, and use their creative minds to enjoy the open space and sun. Families have picnics. There is no moral supremacy in championing play equipment for kids.

All the persons involved in this debate have the public’s best interests in their arguments. There are no “Scrooges” in this matter.

There are disagreements as should be about public matters.

Diane Denish has served this state as a respected leader. Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham is using her best judgement to make difficult decisions. And Sen. Jerry Ortiz Y Pino is trying to reflect the wishes of the public.

This is not an example of “the ugly side of politics,” but rather just legitimate differences of opinion.

SHARI REED Albuquerque