Antelope Valley Press

State regulators reconsider mask standard for workers

- By DON THOMPSON Associated Press

SACRAMENTO — California’s workplace regulators are set to again reconsider controvers­ial masking rules designed to protect employees against the Coronaviru­s — requiremen­ts that business organizati­ons say will make it harder for them to operate when the state fully reopens its economy next week.

A “special meeting’’ of the California Occupation­al Safety and Health Standards Board was hastily scheduled for Wednesday after State Health Officer Dr. Tomás Aragón sent a letter to the panel reiteratin­g the state’s plans to follow federal guidance starting next Tuesday.

Aragón said the state will do away with virtually all social distancing requiremen­ts and drop the mask requiremen­t for people who are vaccinated while “requiring face coverings for all unvaccinat­ed individual­s in indoor public settings and businesses.”

That policy conflicts with the Board’s vote last week to allow workers to go maskless only if every employee in a room is fully vaccinated against the Coronaviru­s. The Board will consider Aragón’s letter “and take action if appropriat­e,” Board spokeswoma­n Erika Monterroza said.

Meanwhile, a dozen business groups including the California Retailers Associatio­n and organizati­ons representi­ng manufactur­ers, farmers, tourism interests and other industries sent a letter to Gov. Gavin Newsom asking him to immediatel­y issue an emergency order rescinding the Board’s regulation­s, called Emergency Temporary Standards (ETS), and putting state workplaces in compliance with federal guidelines.

Without such action, the groups said the state’s economy won’t fully reopen next week as Newsom has said.

“Businesses will not bring employees back with the level of confusion and uncertaint­y created by the ETS and the mixed messages coming from state and local leaders,” the letter said.

The groups called the Board’s regulation­s “expensive liabilitie­s for businesses of all sizes, but especially for small businesses who may not have the legal expertise to navigate the confusing and contradict­ory statements and regulation­s coming from various levels of government.”

Newsom was asked last Friday if he would issue such an order and he indicated he was disincline­d.

On Tuesday, Newsom’s office repeated its statement from last week: that the administra­tion is “hopeful the Board will further revise its guidance to reflect the latest science while continuing to protect workers and balancing realistic and enforceabl­e requiremen­ts for employers.”

The Cal/OSHA Board’s regulation­s apply in almost every workplace in the state, including workers in offices, factories and retail.

Its pandemic rules apply to all employees except those working from home or where there is a single employee who does not have contact with other people.

The Board at Wednesday’s meeting could withdraw the new rules that it adopted less than a week ago because those have not yet become effective, Monterroza said.

But that would at least temporaril­y leave in place existing emergency rules that are even more stringent, requiring all workers to keep distanced and masked even if vaccinated.

The Board can’t adopt new changes without posting the proposed revisions and giving the public at least five calendar days of notice, she said. That potentiall­y sets up further public comment and action at the Board’s regularly scheduled June 17 meeting.

 ?? ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES ?? A worker wears a mask while setting up a fruit display last month amid the COVID-19 pandemic at The Farmers’ Market in Los Angeles. Business and agricultur­al groups are renewing their criticism of new rules adopted by California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s workplace regulators.
ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES A worker wears a mask while setting up a fruit display last month amid the COVID-19 pandemic at The Farmers’ Market in Los Angeles. Business and agricultur­al groups are renewing their criticism of new rules adopted by California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s workplace regulators.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States