Antelope Valley Press

County extends rent protection; Barger outvoted

- By JULIE DRAKE Valley Press Staff Writer

Supervisor Kathryn Barger cast the lone “no” vote when the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisor­s, on Tuesday, voted to extend tenant protection­s through Dec. 31 and make county code changes to the maximum allowable annual rent increase.

The protection­s were first put in place, in March 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

A motion by Supervisor­s Sheila Kuehl and Hilda Solis extended the no-fault protection­s as a baseline for tenants across the county, who utilized the county’s non-payment of rent protection­s, in 2022, and are within the 12-month repayment window, according to the motion.

“These protection­s have provided a critical support to tenants impacted by the COVID pandemic, including those who live in incorporat­ed cities without their own tenant protection­s,” the motion said.

The updated resolution also revised the definition of “financial impacts” to clarify that a “substantia­l loss” of household income is a loss of at least 10% of a tenant’s monthly household income, as well as increased costs for things such as for food, fuel and child care.

It also clarified that a tenant has the burden to prove the basis of their self-certificat­ion and that a landlord is not criminally or civilly liable for pursuing and filing an unlawful detainer action if they have a reasonable belief that the

tenant’s self-certificat­ion is fraudulent.

The changes to the county code amends Chapter 8.52 (Rent Stabilizat­ion and Tenant Protection­s) of Title 8 — Consumer Protection, Business and Wage Regulation­s. It imposes, from Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2023, a temporary cap to 3% on the maximum allowable annual rent increase for fully covered rental units and 5% for luxury units in unincorpor­ated areas of the county. It also establishe­d no-fault eviction protection­s in incorporat­ed cities.

“Tenant protection­s have been in place for about three years,” Barger said in a statement. “My ‘no’ vote reflects my belief that mom-andpop property owners are being unfairly burdened. It’s a mistake to pass a one-size-fits-all policy that protects tenants who refuse to pay any portion of their rent or work with their landlord.”

She said the Board initially took action due to the COVID-19 emergency and shutdown of the county’s economy.

“But the pandemic and public health orders are no longer affecting people’s ability to work,” she said. “We are also overreachi­ng by implementi­ng a 3% rent increase cap for unincorpor­ated areas under the county’s Rent Stabilizat­ion Ordinance and establishi­ng no-fault eviction protection­s in incorporat­ed cities. I disagree with the continued use of the county’s police powers, which should be reserved for dire emergencie­s. We are well past that point.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States