Antelope Valley Press

UK court rules against Scottish independen­ce plan

-

LONDON (AP) — The UK Supreme Court ruled, Wednesday, that Scotland does not have the power to hold a new referendum on independen­ce without the consent of the British government. The judgment is a setback for the Scottish government’s campaign to break away from the United Kingdom.

Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said she would respect the ruling but continue the fight for independen­ce, saying Scotland’s “democratic right to choose our own future” was at stake.

The top court ruled that the Scottish Parliament “does not have the power to legislate for a referendum on Scottish independen­ce.”

Supreme Court President Robert Reed said the five justices were unanimous in the verdict, delivered six weeks after lawyers for the pro-independen­ce Scottish administra­tion and the Conservati­ve UK government argued their cases at hearings in London.

Independen­ce supporters plan to rally outside the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh and at other sites, later Wednesday.

The semi-autonomous Scottish government wants to hold a referendum next October with the question “Should Scotland be an independen­t country?”

The UK government in London refuses to approve a vote, saying the question was settled in a 2014 referendum that saw Scottish voters reject independen­ce by a margin of 55% to 45%.

The pro-independen­ce government in Edinburgh wants to revisit the decision, though, arguing that Britain’s departure from the European Union — which a majority of Scottish voters opposed — has radically changed the political and economic landscape.

Sturgeon argues that she has a democratic mandate from the Scottish people to hold a new secession vote because there is an independen­ce-supporting majority in the Scottish Parliament.

During Supreme Court hearings, last month, Dorothy Bain, the Scottish government’s top law officer, said the majority of Scottish lawmakers had been elected on commitment­s to hold a fresh independen­ce referendum. She also said a referendum would be advisory, rather than legally binding — though a “yes” vote would create strong momentum for Scotland to break away.

UK government lawyer James Eadie argued that power to hold a referendum rests with the UK Parliament in London, because “it’s of critical importance to the United Kingdom as a whole,” not just Scotland.

The Supreme Court justices agreed. They said it is clear that “a Bill which makes provision for a referendum on independen­ce — on ending the sovereignt­y of the Parliament of the United Kingdom over Scotland — has more than a loose or consequent­ial connection with the sovereignt­y of that Parliament.”

 ?? ASSOCIATED PRESS banner, Tuesday, outside ?? Supporters of Scottish Independen­ce the Supreme Court in London. hold a
ASSOCIATED PRESS banner, Tuesday, outside Supporters of Scottish Independen­ce the Supreme Court in London. hold a

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States