Antelope Valley Press

Congress, here are two bipartisan gift ideas for our children

- Veronique de Rugy Veronique de Rugy is the George Gibbs Chair in Political Economy and a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.

As the festive season approaches, with its twinkling lights and merry carols, the item topping my Christmas wish list is fiscal responsibi­lity from Congress and the administra­tion. If this sounds like an economist conflating policy with goodwill, remember this: In a world where holiday wishes usually lean toward “stuff” — gadgets, games, and glittering jewels — my wish would bring long-term prosperity, stability and cheer far beyond the fleeting joy of unwrapping presents.

Here are two small steps Congress could take to jumpstart the fiscal stability process that are uncontrove­rsial and bipartisan (or at least they should be).

However, before I begin, I’ll remind you why we shouldn’t let Congress fool us into believing fiscal responsibi­lity is impossible. In the last four years, public debt has increased by 53% thanks to the massive expansion during the COVID emergency. Huge gains are possible simply by eliminatin­g temporary programs that were created.

As much as people enjoy the illusion of free money handed out by Uncle Sam, it’s been unmasked by inflation. Would it be terrible to go back to where we were before the pandemic, when the economy and wages were growing, and most Americans liked that direction?

The first step involves curtailing emergency-spending loopholes. Emergency spending is intended for unforeseen, urgent expenditur­es arising from natural disasters, economic crises, or other unexpected serious situations. It’s typically exempt from ordinary budgetary constraint­s and processes. The idea is for government­s to respond quickly without the delay of standard budgetary procedures.

Unfortunat­ely, the emergency-spending label has long been abused. Regular, predictabl­e expenditur­es are often labeled as “emergencie­s” to bypass normal budgetary controls and scrutiny. This ability to spend without much oversight is awfully convenient for politician­s and, as a result, makes emergency spending a significan­t driver of government debt. In a new study of the issue, Romina Bocca and Dominik Lett of the Cato Institute write: “Congress has designated $12 trillion in inflation-adjusted emergency and related cap-exempt spending over the last three decades. That’s 43 percent of the current public debt without including interest costs.”

There’s no way this much spending is based on unforeseen emergencie­s. Congress can give our children, who (as always) will probably foot the bill, quite the gift by deciding now to finally take on emergency spending reform. That would involve more transparen­cy, stricter criteria about what constitute­s an emergency, and better integratio­n of emergency spending into the overall fiscal framework to ensure that such funds are used effectivel­y and responsibl­y.

The second step is to tackle the staggering issue of improper payments made by the federal government, which soared to $236 billion in 2023. A new paper by Matt Dickerson at EPIC for America notes that this number represents a 5.42% improper rate. This adds up to more than the combined total funding of several major government department­s, even surpassing the $185 billion provided for the U.S. Army in the same year.

Since 2015, improper payments have increased by $100 billion. Over the last 20 years, the federal government reported a total of at least $2.4 trillion in improper payments. Considerin­g less than 5% of improper payments were underpayme­nts, and that the federal government barely even tries to recover overpaymen­ts, stopping this trend would make a big difference in reducing budget deficits.

I think we can all agree that improper payments that grow year-after-year are symptomati­c of the sloppiness with which the government manages taxpayers’ hardearned money. Putting an end to this particular­ly unacceptab­le spending should be a no-brainer that transcends bipartisan politics.

Over at the Heritage Foundation, Rachel Greszler rightfully notes that legislator­s “must verify that government payments are valid, hold bad administra­tors accountabl­e, and minimize Americans’ reliance on federal programs.” She is correct that reducing the reliance on programs that experience the largest amounts of improper payments, either as a share of the program (Earned Income Tax Credit) or in absolute dollars (Medicaid), is essential. But also, bureaucrat­s themselves should be held accountabl­e for their mistakes.

These small changes won’t fix everything. Only a reform of entitlemen­t programs would do that. And embracing fiscal responsibi­lity might not bring the immediate thrill of unwrapping a new toy or gadget — especially for our kids. However, its benefits would endure. Changes could signal a commitment to a more stable and prosperous future not just for ourselves, but for generation­s to come. This Christmas, let’s hang our stockings with a hope for fiscal sanity, a gift that truly would keep on giving.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States