Vaccine shots decline after DOH changes
Quiet changes made to the South Dakota Department of Health’s Community Health Services and the Women, Infants and Children program have left many counties without resident community health nurses, exacerbating an already-declining trend in some vaccinations across the state.
Clay County Commission chair Betty Smith told South Dakota News Watch that her county reported zero vaccinations in the month of September after the DOH restructured community health and told its staff they could choose to work either in WIC or community health but not both, as they had before.
When Clay County nurses opted to work for WIC, there was suddenly nobody allowed to administer vaccines.
“Vaccinations occur when mothers come in for WIC services, and they’re not happening,” Smith said. “This is a system guaranteed to decrease the vaccination rate.”
Clay County now shares a community health nurse with neighboring Lincoln County. Smith has concerns about the long-term effectiveness.
“... The Lincoln County nurse is really, really busy and doesn’t have time,” she said. “We’ve had from the end of August to (the end of October) two nurse visits, and we used to have three days a week of nursing service.”
Smith said she was told the nurse wouldn’t come to Clay County for single vaccinations, and they would instead have to bundle services with other clients on specific days.
“For people who are working, they have to take time off from work for which they are likely not paid to go to these appointments,” Smith said. “If you live in poverty, you don’t have the capacity to decide necessarily when you can go and do these things.”
DOH told commissioners during a Nov. 6 call that the restructure addresses the “changing needs of our clients and citizens of South Dakota” while also helping the WIC program stay within budget, which they said has been exceeded by $1.2 million.
“Our public health infrastructure, which kind of started with WIC, was built around having nurses provide WIC services,” DOH Office of Child and Family Services administrator Katelyn Strasser told commissioners. “And it can be costly.”
Strasser told commissioners she wants to get the service to a point where it will no longer rely on federal assistance or an increase of state assistance.
After nurses were given the choice between working for community health or WIC, 18 went to WIC and 35 chose public health nursing, according to DOH.
Smith said she did not receive any official communication about the change in her county, only hearing about the restructure from her county’s WIC staff weeks later.
“We weren’t consulted whatsoever in this restructure, and I think that’s problematic,” said Klimisch, who told News Watch he didn’t receive official communication either. “We’re supposed to be have a partnership with the state on county public health, and the counties have an interest in public health and the welfare of our citizens.”
Yankton County Commission chair Don Kettering said he didn’t receive official communication either but is open to the changes.
“If you’re going to not raise property taxes and other taxes, (the money’s) got to come from some place if you’re going to keep funding all of these things, and I think that’s their challenge,” Kettering told News Watch.
South Dakota Codified Law Chapter 28-13 requires counties to assist their residents who are unable to pay for necessary medical care. Klimisch fears with less available service, more people will need relief.
“If people aren’t getting the care ahead of time to fix health issues, they may become much more expensive to the counties down the line,” he said.
DOH said the restructuring does not equate to less service.
“I think there may be a little bit of a misconception that we’re taking away public health nursing services, that maybe if the nurse in your county chose (to work with) WIC and is now working full time at WIC that you’ll be receiving less public health services, and that’s just not our intent at all,” Strasser told commissioners.
DOH also told commissioners clients felt they were “receiving too many services at the same time,” and that they would go to the office for WIC not realizing they’d be getting immunizations, pregnancy care appointments or other services that could prolong the appointment.
Officials from the Department of Health declined an interview and instead sent a statement from Secretary of Health Melissa Magstadt.
“Client satisfaction surveys indicated that they wanted different service delivery options and that receiving several services in the same appointment was burdensome and too time consuming,” she said.
Strasser said having shorter appointments will help people who work by requiring them to take less time off. But she didn’t say anything about the decrease in service days or possibility of needing to make two or more appointments to receive WIC and community health care. She also highlighted a push to schedule entire families into one appointment to increase efficiency.
Klimisch is concerned about what may be down the line.
“There’s a history of the state just dropping these responsibilities onto the counties with no monetary way for us to pay for them,” Klimisch said. “It’s very troubling and I hope it’s not what’s happening here, but it certainly seems like that.”
This article was produced by South Dakota News Watch, a non-profit journalism organization located online at sdnewswatch.org.