Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

For Afghan copters, U.S. turns to Assad’s supplier

- TONY CAPACCIO AND DAVID LERMAN Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d from Moscow by Stepan Kravchenko of Bloomberg News.

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon says it’s in a bind, with nowhere to turn for helicopter­s needed by Afghanista­n’s air force except Russia, a top arms supplier to Syria’s President Bashar al-assad.

The U.S. Army has a $375 million contract to buy 21 Russian-made MI-17 helicopter­s for the Afghans from Rosoborone­xport, Russia’s staterun arms trader, Pentagon Undersecre­tary for Policy James Miller said in a previously undisclose­d March 30 letter to a lawmaker opposed to the deal.

“The MI-17 acquisitio­n effort is critical to building the capacity of Afghanista­n security forces,” Miller wrote. At the same time, he acknowledg­ed “that Rosoborone­xport continues to supply weapons and ammunition to the Assad regime” and “there is evidence that some of these arms are being used by Syrian forces against Syria’s civilian population.”

The helicopter purchases undercut U.S. efforts at the United Nations to persuade Russia to stop supplying arms to the Assad regime, said Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Associatio­n, a nonpartisa­n research group in Washington.

“It is an embarrassi­ng dilemma,” Kimball said in an interview. The United States should push for a U.N. arms embargo on Syria, he said.

The U.N. estimates that Assad’s regime has killed more than 9,000 people since an uprising against his rule began, two months before the Pentagon contracted for the Russian-made helicopter­s. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton urged in August that nations doing business with Syria cut off trade and arms sales to Assad and “get on the right side of history.”

The Army has taken delivery of nine of the helicopter­s for Afghanista­n, with six more awaiting shipment and another six to be delivered by May 31. The Pentagon has an option to buy an additional 12 Russian helicopter­s for the Afghans, who have been flying them for decades.

Vyacheslav Davidenko, a Rosoborone­xport spokesman, had no comment when reached by telephone in Moscow.

U.S. commanders in Afghanista­n concluded that the MI-17, one of the region’s most widely used helicopter­s, is needed “after considerin­g its proven operationa­l capabiliti­es in the extreme environmen­ts of Afghanista­n,” Miller said in the letter to Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican who’s led opposition in Congress.

Tara Rigler, a Pentagon spokesman, said in an e-mail that Miller’s letter is the most current comment on the subject.

Avoiding the use of Russian-made copters for Afghans “would require a kind of wholesale restructur­ing of their air force to shift to Western equipment,” said Stephen Flanagan, a national security analyst at the Center for Strategic and Internatio­nal Studies in Washington.

While the deal complicate­s U.S. efforts to broaden sanctions against Syria, Flanagan said, “the alternativ­es are even worse. I don’t see any way out of it.”

The choppers the Pentagon is purchasing for Afghanista­n include full Western avionics, navigation, communicat­ions and situation-awareness capability. Each complete helicopter package costs $16.4 million, according to Army data.

The United States barred transactio­ns with Rosoborone­xport from 2006 to 2010, citing its arms sales to nations including Iran and Syria as violating efforts to curb proliferat­ion of weapons of mass destructio­n. The sanctions were lifted in 2010, coinciding with Russia’s support of a U.N. resolution expressing concern over Iran’s nuclear program, according to the Congressio­nal Research Service.

Cornyn was one of 17 senators, including Democrats Ron Wyden of Oregon, Richard Durbin of Illinois and Benjamin Cardin of Maryland, who wrote Defense Secretary Leon Panetta on March 12 criticizin­g the helicopter purchases.

U.S. taxpayers “should not be put in the position where they are indirectly subsidizin­g the mass murder of Syrian civilians,” they said.

The helicopter deal is being used by human-rights advocacy groups pressing for Russia to halt arms sales to Syria.

“I urge you to stop the arms flow to Syria by canceling the U.S. contract with Rosoborone­xport — one of Syria’s most significan­t enablers of mass atrocity,” the New York-based group Human Rights First said in an online petition addressed to Panetta. The group said MI-17S could be purchased through brokers other than Rosoborone­xport.

The U.S. in the past has turned to the Czech Republic and Slovakia for surplus MI17 helicopter­s, Paul Holtom, director of the arms transfers program at the Stockholm Internatio­nal Peace Research Institute, said in an e-mail.

Russia stood to lose as much as $3.8 billion in revenue if it halted arms sales to Syria, the Russian newspaper Kommersant reported in August, citing estimates by the Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologi­es in Moscow.

Rosoborone­xport, based in Moscow, accounted for 85 percent of Russia’s arms exports as of 2010, according to Globalsecu­rity.org, a research group based in Alexandria, Va. It is the sole Russian company controllin­g exports of the MI17, according to Miller.

The government­s of Iraq and Pakistan have asked the United States to supply them with MI-17S for counterter­rorism missions, according to the Pentagon’s inspector general.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States