At Chicago, trains move like molasses
Cross-country freight hits rail bog
CHICAGO — When it comes to rail traffic, Chicago is America’s speed bump.
Shippers complain that a load of freight can make its way from Los Angeles to Chicago in 48 hours, then take 30 hours to travel across the city. A recent trainload of sulfur took some 27 hours to pass through Chicago — an average speed of 1.13 miles per hour, or about a quarter the pace of many electric wheelchairs.
With freight volume in the United States expected to grow by more than 80 percent in the next 20 years, delays are projected to only get worse.
The underlying reasons for this sprawling traffic jam are complex, involving history, economics and a nation’s disinclination to improve its roads, bridges, and rails.
Six of the nation’s seven biggest railroads pass through the city, a testament to Chicago’s economic might when the rail lines were laid from the 1800s on. Today, a quar-
ter of all rail traffic in the nation touches Chicago. Nearly half of what is known as intermodal rail traffic, the big steel boxes that can be carried aboard ships, trains or trucks, roll by or through this city.
The slowdown involves more than freight.
The other day, William C. Thompson, a project manager for the Association of American Railroads, stood next to a crossroads of steel in the Englewood neighborhood pointing to a web of tracks used by freight trains and Amtrak passenger trains that intersected tracks for Metra, Chicago’s commuter rail. The commuter trains get to go first, he said, and so “Amtrak tells me they have more delays here than anywhere else in the system.”
More delays than anywhere else in the Chicago area? No, he explained. “In the entire United States.”
Now federal, state, local and industry officials are completing the early stages of a $3.2 billion project to untangle Chicago’s rail system — not just for its residents, who suffer commuter train delays and long waits in their cars at grade crossings, but for the rest of the nation as well.
The program, called CREATE (an acronym for Chicago Region Environmental and Transportation Efficiency Program), is intended to replace 25 rail intersections with overpasses and underpasses that will smooth the flow of traffic for the 1,300 freight and passenger trains that muscle through the city each day, and to separate tracks now shared by freight and passenger trains at critical spots. Fifty miles of new track will link yards and create a second east-west route across the city, building redundancy into the overburdened system.
Fourteen of the 70 projects have been completed so far, and 12 more are under way, including the $140 million “Englewood flyover,” or overpass.
While much of the country’s attention on transportation matters is focused on high-speed rail projects trumpeted by the Obama administration, CREATE is largely about bringing old-fashioned low-speed rail up to modern standards.
Innovative financing combines federal, state and private funds from various programs, including the federal stimulus packages. CREATE even uses some funds tied to highspeed rail, since many of the projects are being designed to accommodate those lines in the future.
One of the biggest holdups for freight traffic is that Chicago’s crowded rails must also get hundreds of thousands of commuters to work and home mornings and evenings, and so by an agreement known as the Chicago Protocol, the shared tracks and intersections belong to passenger rail during rush hours. The progress of a few recent trains as measured by the railroads shows how the delays occur. Among them was a coal train traveling 1,100 miles east from the Powder River Basin in Wyoming.
The train reached Chicago in 60 hours; its average speed, with delays for traffic control and a delivery schedule on the first leg, was 18 miles per hour. Within the “corral” of the greater Chicago area, the average speed dropped to 3.9 miles per hour, the pace of a rapid walk. It took more than 10 hours to move the 40 miles across the city.
It had to stop completely on the outskirts of town during commuter rush hours and wait its turn at “interlockings” — go-slow rail intersections like the one at Englewood. Once outside Chicago, the train’s average leapt to 36 miles per hour.
Some of the causes of delay might have seemed outdated in the 20th century, much less the 21st, like manual switches that engineers have to throw after their trains have passed. CREATE is replacing them with electronic switches and online traffic control networks, but until then engineers at some points have to get out of their cabins, walk the length of the train back to the switch — a mile or more — operate the switch, and then trudge back to their place at the head of the train before setting out again.
Chicago had lived with its rail anachronisms and idiosyncrasies for decades, but everything fell apart in a 1999 blizzard that paralyzed the city’s rails and backed up train traffic across the U.S. for months.
“The traffic just kept coming and coming and coming,” said David Grewe, a supervisor for Union Pacific Railroad. “We basically waited for the spring thaw.”
The resulting plan to fix the city’s rail problems started with efforts to reduce delays by improving coordination among the six freight rail companies, an effort that includes Grewe, as well as Metra and Amtrak. “You would have thought that coordination would have taken place in the past,” Grewe said. “Unfortunately, it didn’t.”
Thompson, the rail association’s program manager for CREATE, said that building during a recession had produced a bonus, as construction companies eager to get the work have come in under budget on every project. “It’s a very good time to be building infrastructure,” he said.
With more than a dozen of the smaller projects in place, rail officials say they have already seen some reduction in delays, said Joe Shachter, director of public and intermodal transportation for the Illinois Department of Transportation, with bigger improvements to come. “The next two or three years in particular we think are going to show great advances,” he said.
But the full benefits will be felt only if all of the projects can be completed, Thompson said: A knot of interrelated problems requires a network of solutions.
And there lies a potentially larger problem than anything in the steel rails that snake across the city. While some of the financing for CREATE has come from private industry and state bonds, further progress depends almost entirely on the ability of Congress to pass transportation legislation. That legislation has historically been passed in a bipartisan manner. But Congress, eager to squeeze the budget and in continual disagreement about the nation’s priorities, has found itself repeatedly at impasse over the current transportation bill.
To Brian Imus, staff director of Illinois PIRG, a consumer group, “it seems like as much gridlock as we’ve got with our trains, it’s even worse in Washington, D.C.”