Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Nannies, like parents, are not there to entertain

- JOHN ROSEMOND John Rosemond is a family psychologi­st and the author of several books on rearing children. Write to him at The Leadership Parenting Institute, 1391-A E. Garrison Blvd., Gastonia, N.C. 28054; or see his website at rosemond.com

A mother asked me a most interestin­g and currently pertinent question the other day: “How much one-on-one interactio­n should take place between a nanny and a child under her supervisio­n?” The question is pertinent because increasing numbers of upper-middle-class parents are choosing to use nannies for daily child care instead of or in addition to day-care centers and preschools. I will say, up front, that I have no general opinion of this trend at all. Each nanny situation should be judged on its own merits or lack thereof.

I have some personal experience with this issue because during my preschool years, when my mom was a single parent and we lived in Charleston, S.C., she hired a woman to come into our flat and supervise me when she was working and attending college. Gertie Mae, to whom I grew quite attached, also performed housekeepi­ng responsibi­lities outside of supervisin­g me, but her role was similar, in many respects, to that of today’s nanny. Outside of the fact that she occasional­ly insisted I eat food I did not like, my experience of the relationsh­ip was completely positive. She was an important figure in my life and I remember her fondly.

I am aware that many of today’s nannies are expected to or feel they cannot adequately justify their salaries unless they play with their charges and otherwise provide a good amount of stimulatin­g and enjoyable activities for them. In a word, they entertain. I have no memories of Gertie Mae ever playing with me or providing me with entertainm­ent. Both she and my mother expected me to entertain myself, which is one of the most important life skills a child ever acquires, and the earlier acquired, the better for all concerned. The child who learns to entertain himself is also, later on, more likely to do his own homework without much if any supervisio­n, perform regular household responsibi­lities without prompting, solve peer problems without coming to adults, and so on.

None of the nanny websites that I looked at used the word “entertainm­ent” when describing nanny responsibi­lities. The website nannies4hi­re.com, for example, listed preparing children’s meals, providing mental stimulatio­n, doing children’s laundry, and reinforcin­g appropriat­e discipline as primary nanny responsibi­lities. Facilitati­ng playgroups was mentioned as an “additional” responsibi­lity, but facilitati­ng and entertaini­ng are horses of different colors.

As most of my readers know, I advocate a low-involvemen­t parenting style where children enjoy freedoms commensura­te with the responsibi­lity they are willing to assume for themselves and their behavior. To use a political analogy, it’s a libertaria­n parenting philosophy that allows children to learn, largely by trial and error, how to run their lives with minimal need for Big Parental Government. Speaking personally, it was not so much my mother’s job to be involved with me as it was my job to keep her from getting involved. This creates a mutual state of liberation for parents (especially mom) and child.

This is the way children were raised two generation­s and more ago, when they emancipate­d much earlier and more successful­ly than has been the case since. That’s why my answer to the question posed in paragraph one above is “As little as possible,” and why it applies to parents and nannies.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States